These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18542410)

  • 1. Some simple rules for contrast, signal-to-noise and resolution in in-line x-ray phase-contrast imaging.
    Gureyev TE; Nesterets YI; Stevenson AW; Miller PR; Pogany A; Wilkins SW
    Opt Express; 2008 Mar; 16(5):3223-41. PubMed ID: 18542410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. X-ray phase-contrast imaging: transmission functions separable in Cartesian coordinates.
    Cao G; Hamilton TJ; Rose-Petruck C; Diebold GJ
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2007 Apr; 24(4):1201-8. PubMed ID: 17361308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving visibility of X-ray phase-contrast imaging with Wiener filtering.
    Gong S; Gao F; Zhou Z
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2010; 18(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 20714086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The second-order differential phase contrast and its retrieval for imaging with x-ray Talbot interferometry.
    Yang Y; Tang X
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7237-53. PubMed ID: 23231275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Geometry-constraint-scan imaging for in-line phase contrast micro-CT.
    Fu J; Yu G; Fan D
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3105-11. PubMed ID: 25227019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Higher-order phase shift reconstruction approach.
    Cong W; Wang G
    Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5238-42. PubMed ID: 21089757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Penalized weighted least-squares approach to sinogram noise reduction and image reconstruction for low-dose X-ray computed tomography.
    Wang J; Li T; Lu H; Liang Z
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Oct; 25(10):1272-83. PubMed ID: 17024831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification of the effect of system and object parameters on edge enhancement in phase-contrast radiography.
    Donnelly EF; Price RR; Pickens DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2888-96. PubMed ID: 14655935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple, direct method for x-ray scatter estimation and correction in digital radiography and cone-beam CT.
    Siewerdsen JH; Daly MJ; Bakhtiar B; Moseley DJ; Richard S; Keller H; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):187-97. PubMed ID: 16485425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative characterization of edge enhancement in phase contrast x-ray imaging.
    Monnin P; Bulling S; Hoszowska J; Valley JF; Meuli R; Verdun FR
    Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1372-83. PubMed ID: 15259641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noise in x-ray grating-based phase-contrast imaging.
    Weber T; Bartl P; Bayer F; Durst J; Haas W; Michel T; Ritter A; Anton G
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4133-40. PubMed ID: 21859014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Edge enhancement algorithm for low-dose X-ray fluoroscopic imaging.
    Lee MS; Park CH; Kang MG
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Dec; 152():45-52. PubMed ID: 29054260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative evaluation of noise reduction strategies in dual-energy imaging.
    Warp RJ; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):190-8. PubMed ID: 12607836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of edge effect due to phase contrast imaging for mammography.
    Matsuo S; Katafuchi T; Tohyama K; Morishita J; Yamada K; Fujita H
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2690-7. PubMed ID: 16193800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
    Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A theoretical study on phase-contrast mammography with Thomson-scattering x-ray sources.
    De Caro L; Giannini C; Bellotti R; Tangaro S
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4644-53. PubMed ID: 19928096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CT energy weighting in the presence of scatter and limited energy resolution.
    Schmidt TG
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1056-67. PubMed ID: 20384241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial resolution of edge illumination X-ray phase-contrast imaging.
    Diemoz PC; Vittoria FA; Olivo A
    Opt Express; 2014 Jun; 22(13):15514-29. PubMed ID: 24977810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
    Honda C; Ohara H
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.