These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18542636)

  • 1. Comparison of generalized phase contrast and computer generated holography for laser image projection.
    Palima D; Glückstad J
    Opt Express; 2008 Apr; 16(8):5338-49. PubMed ID: 18542636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Harmonic holography: a new holographic principle.
    Pu Y; Centurion M; Psaltis D
    Appl Opt; 2008 Feb; 47(4):A103-10. PubMed ID: 18239691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative phase-contrast microscopy by a lateral shear approach to digital holographic image reconstruction.
    Ferraro P; Alferi D; De Nicola S; De Petrocellis L; Finizio A; Pierattini G
    Opt Lett; 2006 May; 31(10):1405-7. PubMed ID: 16642120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coherent noise reduction in digital holographic phase contrast microscopy by slightly shifting object.
    Pan F; Xiao W; Liu S; Wang F; Rong L; Li R
    Opt Express; 2011 Feb; 19(5):3862-9. PubMed ID: 21369211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speckle suppression in scanning laser display.
    Yurlov V; Lapchuk A; Yun S; Song J; Yang H
    Appl Opt; 2008 Jan; 47(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 18188199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital self-referencing quantitative phase microscopy by wavefront folding in holographic image reconstruction.
    Coppola G; Di Caprio G; Gioffré M; Puglisi R; Balduzzi D; Galli A; Miccio L; Paturzo M; Grilli S; Finizio A; Ferraro P
    Opt Lett; 2010 Oct; 35(20):3390-2. PubMed ID: 20967076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigation of living pancreas tumor cells by digital holographic microscopy.
    Kemper B; Carl D; Schnekenburger J; Bredebusch I; Schäfer M; Domschke W; von Bally G
    J Biomed Opt; 2006; 11(3):34005. PubMed ID: 16822055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dependency and precision of the refocusing criterion based on amplitude analysis in digital holographic microscopy.
    El Mallahi A; Dubois F
    Opt Express; 2011 Mar; 19(7):6684-98. PubMed ID: 21451695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microscopy image resolution improvement by deconvolution of complex fields.
    Cotte Y; Toy MF; Pavillon N; Depeursinge C
    Opt Express; 2010 Sep; 18(19):19462-78. PubMed ID: 20940842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fast reconfiguration algorithm of computer generated holograms for adaptive view direction change in holographic three-dimensional display.
    Cho J; Hahn J; Kim H
    Opt Express; 2012 Dec; 20(27):28282-91. PubMed ID: 23263063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital holographic microscopy: a noninvasive contrast imaging technique allowing quantitative visualization of living cells with subwavelength axial accuracy.
    Marquet P; Rappaz B; Magistretti PJ; Cuche E; Emery Y; Colomb T; Depeursinge C
    Opt Lett; 2005 Mar; 30(5):468-70. PubMed ID: 15789705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improvement of linewidth in laser beam lithographed computer generated hologram.
    Rhee HG; Lee YW
    Opt Express; 2010 Jan; 18(2):1734-40. PubMed ID: 20174001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suppression of the zero-order term in off-axis digital holography through nonlinear filtering.
    Pavillon N; Seelamantula CS; Kühn J; Unser M; Depeursinge C
    Appl Opt; 2009 Dec; 48(34):H186-95. PubMed ID: 19956290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward the light field display: autostereoscopic rendering via a cluster of projectors.
    Yang R; Huang X; Li S; Jaynes C
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2008; 14(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 17993704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative phase imaging by three-wavelength digital holography.
    Mann CJ; Bingham PR; Paquit VC; Tobin KW
    Opt Express; 2008 Jun; 16(13):9753-64. PubMed ID: 18575544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speckle removal using a maximum-likelihood technique with isoline gray-level regularization.
    Bertaux N; Frauel Y; Réfrégier P; Javidi B
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2004 Dec; 21(12):2283-91. PubMed ID: 15603063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rotation-free holographic imaging with extended arc reference.
    Lan P; Takahashi EJ; Midorikawa K
    Opt Express; 2012 Mar; 20(6):6669-76. PubMed ID: 22418550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential interference contrast microscopy for cells using hard x-ray holography.
    Matsuda K; Lopez JCA; Rehman S; Misawa M; Suzuki Y; Takeuchi A; Yasumoto M; Hibino K; Roy M; Hanayama R; Ishii K
    Appl Opt; 2018 Jun; 57(17):4795-4801. PubMed ID: 30118100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Synthetic aperture single-exposure on-axis digital holography.
    Martínez-León L; Javidi B
    Opt Express; 2008 Jan; 16(1):161-9. PubMed ID: 18521144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limits of bootstrapping in a weak-signal holographic conjugator.
    Watnik AT; Lebow PS
    Appl Opt; 2014 Jun; 53(18):3841-7. PubMed ID: 24979413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.