These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18543076)
1. Evidence on the construct validity of the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 in patients with chronic kidney disease. Davison SN; Jhangri GS; Feeny DH Qual Life Res; 2008 Aug; 17(6):933-42. PubMed ID: 18543076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longitudinal construct validity of the Health Utilities Indices Mark 2 and Mark 3 in hip fracture. Jones CA; Pohar SL; Feeny DH; Eng K Qual Life Res; 2014 Apr; 23(3):805-13. PubMed ID: 24081869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores in Alzheimer's disease. Neumann PJ; Sandberg EA; Araki SS; Kuntz KM; Feeny D; Weinstein MC Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(4):413-22. PubMed ID: 11059474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Choosing between measures: comparison of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in persons with hearing complaints. Grutters JP; Joore MA; van der Horst F; Verschuure H; Dreschler WA; Anteunis LJ Qual Life Res; 2007 Oct; 16(8):1439-49. PubMed ID: 17647093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Construct validity for the Health Utilities Index in a sleep center. Welch KC; Scharf SM Sleep Breath; 2007 Dec; 11(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 17457630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Baseline comparison of three health utility measures and the feeling thermometer among participants in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes trial. Raisch DW; Feeney P; Goff DC; Narayan KM; O'Connor PJ; Zhang P; Hire DG; Sullivan MD Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2012 Jul; 11():35. PubMed ID: 22515638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the health utilities indices Mark 2 and Mark 3 in type 2 diabetes. Maddigan SL; Feeny DH; Johnson JA; Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(6):489-501. PubMed ID: 14672109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) with the Short Form-36 preference-based SF-6D in chronic kidney disease. Davison SN; Jhangri GS; Feeny DH Value Health; 2009; 12(2):340-5. PubMed ID: 18657096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A parent-child dyad approach to the assessment of health status and health-related quality of life in children with asthma. Ungar WJ; Boydell K; Dell S; Feldman BM; Marshall D; Willan A; Wright JG Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Aug; 30(8):697-712. PubMed ID: 22788260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mutual concurrent validity of the child health questionnaire and the health utilities index: an exploratory analysis using survivors of childhood cancer. Nixon Speechley K; Maunsell E; Desmeules M; Schanzer D; Landgraf JM; Feeny DH; Barrera ME Int J Cancer Suppl; 1999; 12():95-105. PubMed ID: 10679879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Responsiveness and construct validity of the health utilities index in patients with dementia. Kavirajan H; Hays RD; Vassar S; Vickrey BG Med Care; 2009 Jun; 47(6):651-61. PubMed ID: 19433998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cohort study found the RAND-12 and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 demonstrated construct validity in high-risk primary care patients. Feeny D; Farris K; Côté I; Johnson JA; Tsuyuki RT; Eng K J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 58(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 15680746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative efficiency of the EQ-5D, HUI2, and HUI3 index scores in measuring health burden of chronic medical conditions in a population health survey in the United States. Luo N; Johnson JA; Shaw JW; Coons SJ Med Care; 2009 Jan; 47(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 19106731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing directly measured standard gamble scores to HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores: group- and individual-level comparisons. Feeny D; Furlong W; Saigal S; Sun J Soc Sci Med; 2004 Feb; 58(4):799-809. PubMed ID: 14672594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. Noel CW; Lee DJ; Kong Q; Xu W; Simpson C; Brown D; Gilbert RW; Gullane PJ; Irish JC; Huang SH; O'Sullivan B; Goldstein DP; de Almeida JR JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the discriminatory power of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in a US general population survey using Shannon's indices. Bas Janssen MF; Birnie E; Bonsel GJ Qual Life Res; 2007 Jun; 16(5):895-904. PubMed ID: 17294285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. French cross-cultural adaptation of the Health Utilities Indexes Mark 2 (HUI2) and 3 (HUI3) classification systems. Clinical and Economic Working Groups. Costet N; Le Galès C; Buron C; Kinkor F; Mesbah M; Chwalow J; Slama G Qual Life Res; 1998 Apr; 7(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 9584555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Construct validity of the RAND-12 and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and 3 in type 2 diabetes. Maddigan SL; Feeny DH; Johnson JA; Qual Life Res; 2004 Mar; 13(2):435-48. PubMed ID: 15085916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A study of the construct validity of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) in patients with schizophrenia. Luo N; Seng BK; Thumboo J; Feeny D; Li SC Qual Life Res; 2006 Jun; 15(5):889-98. PubMed ID: 16721648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing short form 6D, standard gamble, and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 utility scores: results from total hip arthroplasty patients. Feeny D; Wu L; Eng K Qual Life Res; 2004 Dec; 13(10):1659-70. PubMed ID: 15651537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]