265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18543374)
1. Second-trimester routine ultrasound screening: expectations and experiences in a nationwide Swedish sample.
Georgsson Ohman S; Waldenström U
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jul; 32(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 18543374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Number of antenatal visits and women's opinion.
Hildingsson I; Rådestad I; Waldenström U
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Mar; 84(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 15715532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perception of information, expectations and experiences among women and their partners attending a second-trimester routine ultrasound scan.
Eurenius K; Axelsson O; Gällstedt-Fransson I; Sjöden PO
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Feb; 9(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 9132261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound screening in the 2nd trimester. The pregnant woman's background knowledge, expectations, experiences and acceptances.
Larsen T; Nguyen TH; Munk M; Svendsen L; Teisner L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 May; 15(5):383-6. PubMed ID: 10976478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why women want prenatal ultrasound in normal pregnancy.
Gudex C; Nielsen BL; Madsen M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 16435312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. First time mothers' pregnancy and birth experiences varying by age.
Zasloff E; Schytt E; Waldenström U
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(11):1328-36. PubMed ID: 17963060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A qualitative study of mothers' and fathers' experiences of routine ultrasound examination in Sweden.
Ekelin M; Crang-Svalenius E; Dykes AK
Midwifery; 2004 Dec; 20(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 15571882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-dimensional vs. two- plus four-dimensional ultrasound in pregnancy and the effect on maternal emotional status: a randomized study.
Rustico MA; Mastromatteo C; Grigio M; Maggioni C; Gregori D; Nicolini U
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 15849804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unexpected diagnosis of fetal abnormality: women's encounters with caregivers.
Lalor JG; Devane D; Begley CM
Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 17324182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychological impact of the detection of soft markers on routine ultrasound scanning: a pilot study investigating the modifying role of information.
Watson MS; Hall S; Langford K; Marteau TM
Prenat Diagn; 2002 Jul; 22(7):569-75. PubMed ID: 12124690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Women's perception of information and experiences of nuchal translucency screening in Greece.
Gourounti K; Lykeridou K; Daskalakis G; Glentis S; Sandall J; Antsaklis A
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2008; 24(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 18648204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of childbirth expectations on Western Australian women's perceptions of their birth experience.
Hauck Y; Fenwick J; Downie J; Butt J
Midwifery; 2007 Sep; 23(3):235-47. PubMed ID: 17097202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Receipt of information and women's attitudes towards ultrasound scanning during pregnancy.
Whynes DK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jan; 19(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 11851962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section.
Hildingsson I; Rådestad I; Rubertsson C; Waldenström U
BJOG; 2002 Jun; 109(6):618-23. PubMed ID: 12118637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why do some women change their opinion about childbirth over time?
Waldenström U
Birth; 2004 Jun; 31(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 15153129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Japanese women's attitudes towards routine ultrasound screening during pregnancy.
Murakami K; Tsujino K; Sase M; Nakata M; Ito M; Kutsunugi S
Nurs Health Sci; 2012 Mar; 14(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 22303983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal anomaly screening: what do women want to know?
Lalor J; Begley C
J Adv Nurs; 2006 Jul; 55(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 16768735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Information, knowledge and expectations of the routine ultrasound scan.
Lalor JG; Devane D
Midwifery; 2007 Mar; 23(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 17011088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physical symptoms after childbirth: prevalence and associations with self-rated health.
Schytt E; Lindmark G; Waldenström U
BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 15663586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Experiences of pregnant women with information procedures in routine ultrasound examinations].
Sommerseth E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Apr; 113(10):1218-20. PubMed ID: 8493650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
