BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18543374)

  • 41. Patient preferences for screening in the first trimester.
    Werner EF; Pastore LM; Karns LB; Ventura KA; Saller DN
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Dec; 28(13):1251-5. PubMed ID: 19097030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Does fetal screening affect women's worries about the health of their baby? A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound screening for Down's syndrome versus routine ultrasound screening.
    Georgsson Ohman S; Saltvedt S; Grunewald C; Waldenström U
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Jul; 83(7):634-40. PubMed ID: 15225187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Viewing ultrasound scan images prior to termination of pregnancy: choice for women or conflict for ultrasonographers?
    Graham O; Ankrett S; Killick SR
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 20604652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of the effects of a birth plan on Taiwanese women's childbirth experiences, control and expectations fulfilment: a randomised controlled trial.
    Kuo SC; Lin KC; Hsu CH; Yang CC; Chang MY; Tsao CM; Lin LC
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jul; 47(7):806-14. PubMed ID: 20036361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Prenatal three-dimensional ultrasound: perception of sonographers, sonologists and undergraduate students.
    Lee S; Pretorius DH; Asfoor S; Hull AD; Newton RP; Hollenbach K; Nelson TR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 30(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 17497645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Did I really want to know this? Pregnant women's reaction to detection of a soft marker during ultrasound screening.
    Ahman A; Runestam K; Sarkadi A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2010 Oct; 81(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 20083367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Women's expectations and intention to terminate pregnancy in case of abnormal findings at the second trimester level II ultrasound scan. A prospective, questionnaire-based, cross-sectional survey.
    Athanasiadis AP; Polychronou P; Mikos T; Pantazis K; Assimakopoulos E; Tzevelekis F; Bontis JN
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2009; 25(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 19521092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Attitude of pregnant women to prenatal screening].
    Jørgensen FS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Sep; 158(39):5447-52. PubMed ID: 8928256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluating multi-dimensional aspects of postnatal hospital care.
    Rudman A; El-Khouri B; Waldenström U
    Midwifery; 2008 Dec; 24(4):425-41. PubMed ID: 17892904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Pregnant women's responses to information about an increased risk of carrying a baby with Down syndrome.
    Susanne GO; Sissel S; Ulla W; Charlotta G; Sonja OL
    Birth; 2006 Mar; 33(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 16499533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Does an informational film increase women's possibility to make an informed choice about second trimester ultrasound?
    Ohman SG; Björklund U; Marsk A
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 Sep; 32(9):833-9. PubMed ID: 22718559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [A qualitative study of pregnant women's choice of nuchal translucency measurement].
    Lou S; Dahl K; Risør MB; Hvidman LE; Thomsen SG; Jørgensen FS; Olesen F; Kjaergaard H; Kesmodel U
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Mar; 169(10):914-8. PubMed ID: 17359736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Prenatal ultrasound exposure and children's school performance at age 15-16: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    Stålberg K; Axelsson O; Haglund B; Hultman CM; Lambe M; Kieler H
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 34(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 19705400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [The attitude of pregnant women to ultrasound screening. A questionnaire study].
    Skov RV
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Jan; 153(4):283-4. PubMed ID: 1996501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Late-term abortion for fetal anomaly: Vietnamese women's experiences.
    Gammeltoft T; Tran MH; Nguyen TH; Nguyen TT
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):46-56. PubMed ID: 18772083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Attitudes towards pelvic examination in a random sample of Swedish women.
    Wijma B; Gullberg M; Kjessler B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Apr; 77(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 9598951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Women's perceptions about seeing the ultrasound picture before an abortion.
    Wiebe ER; Adams L
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2009 Apr; 14(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 19340704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Women's fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean section--a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden.
    Nieminen K; Stephansson O; Ryding EL
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(7):807-13. PubMed ID: 19488882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Pregnant women's assessment and level of knowledge of prenatal counseling].
    Tschudin S; Holzgreve W; Conde N; Alder J; Bitzer J; Tercanli S
    Ultraschall Med; 2009 Apr; 30(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 18484059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Counseling pregnant women who may deliver extremely premature infants: medical care guidelines, family choices, and neonatal outcomes.
    Kaempf JW; Tomlinson MW; Campbell B; Ferguson L; Stewart VT
    Pediatrics; 2009 Jun; 123(6):1509-15. PubMed ID: 19482761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.