These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Neural Basis of the Implicit Learning of Complex Artificial Grammar with Nonadjacent Dependencies. Ling X; Sun P; Zhao L; Jiang S; Lu Y; Cheng X; Guo X; Zhu X; Zheng L J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 34(12):2375-2389. PubMed ID: 36069658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intentional control based on familiarity in artificial grammar learning. Wan L; Dienes Z; Fu X Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1209-18. PubMed ID: 18667335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Independent judgment-linked and motor-linked forms of artificial grammar learning. Seger CA Conscious Cogn; 1998 Jun; 7(2):259-84. PubMed ID: 9690029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A replication and extension of the antisymmetry effect in pigeons. Urcuioli PJ; Swisher M J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Nov; 98(3):283-93. PubMed ID: 23144506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using dual-task methodology to dissociate automatic from nonautomatic processes involved in artificial grammar learning. Hendricks MA; Conway CM; Kellogg RT J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1491-500. PubMed ID: 23627281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What is learned about fragments in artificial grammar learning? A transitional probabilities approach. Poletiek FH; Wolters G Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):868-76. PubMed ID: 19065286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial Grammar Learning in Children With Developmental Language Disorder. Gillis JU; Gul A; Fox A; Parikh A; Arbel Y J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):292-302. PubMed ID: 34860559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Information theory and artificial grammar learning: inferring grammaticality from redundancy. Jamieson RK; Nevzorova U; Lee G; Mewhort DJ Psychol Res; 2016 Mar; 80(2):195-211. PubMed ID: 25828458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Individual differences: either relational learning or item-specific learning in a same/different task. Elmore LC; Wright AA; Rivera JJ; Katz JS Learn Behav; 2009 May; 37(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 19380897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Learning strategies in matching to sample: if-then and configural learning by pigeons. Katz JS; Bodily KD; Wright AA Behav Processes; 2008 Feb; 77(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 18079071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Domain-specific learning of grammatical structure in musical and phonological sequences. Bly BM; Carrión RE; Rasch B Mem Cognit; 2009 Jan; 37(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 19103971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surface features can deeply affect artificial grammar learning. Jiménez L; Mendes Oliveira H; Soares AP Conscious Cogn; 2020 Apr; 80():102919. PubMed ID: 32200204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Grammar or serial order?: discrete combinatorial brain mechanisms reflected by the syntactic mismatch negativity. Pulvermüller F; Assadollahi R J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 19(6):971-80. PubMed ID: 17536967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intact artificial grammar learning in patients with cerebellar degeneration and advanced Parkinson's disease. Witt K; Nühsman A; Deuschl G Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(9):1534-40. PubMed ID: 11985834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual artificial grammar learning by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): exploring the role of grammar complexity and sequence length. Heimbauer LA; Conway CM; Christiansen MH; Beran MJ; Owren MJ Anim Cogn; 2018 Mar; 21(2):267-284. PubMed ID: 29435770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of selective attention in artificial grammar learning. Tanaka D; Kiyokawa S; Yamada A; Dienes Z; Shigemasu K Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Dec; 15(6):1154-9. PubMed ID: 19001583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]