These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1854470)

  • 41. Hemispheric asymmetry in transient visual evoked potentials induced by the spatial factor of the stimulation.
    Rebai M; Bagot JD; Viggiano MP
    Brain Cogn; 1993 Nov; 23(2):263-78. PubMed ID: 8292329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Stationary pattern adaptation and the early components in human visual evoked potentials.
    Hudnell HK; Boyes WK; Otto DA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 1691971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Hemispheric differences for visual evoked potentials from checkerboard stimuli.
    Pike J; Polich J
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(6):947-52. PubMed ID: 3194058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Lateralization of spatial rather than temporal attention underlies the left hemifield advantage in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Asanowicz D; Kruse L; Śmigasiewicz K; Verleger R
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Nov; 118():54-62. PubMed ID: 28797898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Accommodation and the third spatial harmonic.
    Mathews S
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):450-8. PubMed ID: 9661214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Reaction time asymmetry through bilateral versus unilateral stimulus presentation.
    Boles DB
    Brain Cogn; 1987 Jul; 6(3):321-33. PubMed ID: 3606863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Word position affects stimulus recognition: evidence for early ERP short-term plastic modulation.
    Spironelli C; Galfano G; Umiltà C; Angrilli A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Dec; 82(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 21924299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Hemispheric differences for identification of words and nonwords in Urdu-English bilinguals.
    Adamson MM; Hellige JB
    Neuropsychology; 2006 Mar; 20(2):232-48. PubMed ID: 16594784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effects of visual field size on hemispheric asymmetry of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials.
    Mecacci L; Spinelli D; Viggiano MP
    Int J Neurosci; 1990 Mar; 51(1-2):141-51. PubMed ID: 2265903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Reaction time and interhemispheric interaction].
    Kostandov EA; Zakharova NN; Pogrebinskiĭ SA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1978; 28(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 636652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Hemispheric asymmetry in visual discrimination and memory: ERP evidence for the spatial frequency hypothesis.
    Reinvang I; Magnussen S; Greenlee MW
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jun; 144(4):483-95. PubMed ID: 12037633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Symmetrical hemispheric priming in spatial neglect: a hyperactive left-hemisphere phenomenon?
    Nakamura K; Oga T; Takahashi M; Kuribayashi T; Kanamori Y; Matsumiya T; Maeno Y; Yamamoto M
    Cortex; 2012 Apr; 48(4):421-8. PubMed ID: 21292251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Hemispheric asymmetry in temporal resolution: contribution of the magnocellular pathway.
    Okubo M; Nicholls ME
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):755-9. PubMed ID: 16447393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Hemiface contributions to hemispheric dominance in visual speech perception.
    Jordan TR; Thomas SM
    Neuropsychology; 2007 Nov; 21(6):721-31. PubMed ID: 17983286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Spatial frequency discrimination and detection characteristics for gratings defined by orientation texture.
    Gray R; Regan D
    Vision Res; 1998 Sep; 38(17):2601-17. PubMed ID: 12116706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Visual field differences in spatial frequency discrimination.
    Niebauer CL; Christman SD
    Brain Cogn; 1999 Dec; 41(3):381-9. PubMed ID: 10585243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Laterality for visual-spatial processing in two language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
    Hopkins WD; Morris RD
    Behav Neurosci; 1989 Apr; 103(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 2706069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of perceptual quality and visual field of probe stimulus presentation on memory search for letters.
    Hellige JB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Nov; 6(4):639-51. PubMed ID: 6449535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of spatial frequency on global precedence and hemispheric differences.
    Hübner R
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):187-201. PubMed ID: 9055615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Processing of form stimuli presented unilaterally in humans, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Hopkins WD; Washburn DA; Rumbaugh DM
    Behav Neurosci; 1990 Aug; 104(4):577-82. PubMed ID: 2206427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.