BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18544742)

  • 1. Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography.
    Taplin S; Abraham L; Barlow WE; Fenton JJ; Berns EA; Carney PA; Cutter GR; Sickles EA; Carl D; Elmore JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Jun; 100(12):876-87. PubMed ID: 18544742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities.
    Jackson SL; Taplin SH; Sickles EA; Abraham L; Barlow WE; Carney PA; Geller B; Berns EA; Cutter GR; Elmore JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Jun; 101(11):814-27. PubMed ID: 19470953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of previous benign breast biopsy on the interpretive performance of subsequent screening mammography.
    Taplin SH; Abraham L; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Buist DS; Smith-Bindman R; Lehman C; Weaver D; Carney PA; Barlow WE
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Jul; 102(14):1040-51. PubMed ID: 20601590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpretive Performance and Inter-Observer Agreement on Digital Mammography Test Sets.
    Kim SH; Lee EH; Jun JK; Kim YM; Chang YW; Lee JH; Kim HW; Choi EJ;
    Korean J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 30672161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiologist interpretive volume and breast cancer screening accuracy in a Canadian organized screening program.
    Théberge I; Chang SL; Vandal N; Daigle JM; Guertin MH; Pelletier E; Brisson J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Mar; 106(3):djt461. PubMed ID: 24598715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiologist characteristics associated with interpretive performance of diagnostic mammography.
    Miglioretti DL; Smith-Bindman R; Abraham L; Brenner RJ; Carney PA; Bowles EJ; Buist DS; Elmore JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Dec; 99(24):1854-63. PubMed ID: 18073379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice.
    Fenton JJ; Abraham L; Taplin SH; Geller BM; Carney PA; D'Orsi C; Elmore JG; Barlow WE;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Aug; 103(15):1152-61. PubMed ID: 21795668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Criteria for identifying radiologists with acceptable screening mammography interpretive performance on basis of multiple performance measures.
    Miglioretti DL; Ichikawa L; Smith RA; Bassett LW; Feig SA; Monsees B; Parikh JR; Rosenberg RD; Sickles EA; Carney PA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):W486-91. PubMed ID: 25794100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation.
    Beam CA; Conant EF; Sickles EA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Feb; 95(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 12591984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.
    Elmore JG; Jackson SL; Abraham L; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Kerlikowske K; Onega T; Rosenberg RD; Sickles EA; Buist DS
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):641-51. PubMed ID: 19864507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time trends in radiologists' interpretive performance at screening mammography from the community-based Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, 1996-2004.
    Ichikawa LE; Barlow WE; Anderson ML; Taplin SH; Geller BM; Brenner RJ;
    Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 20505059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Diagnostic Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Sprague BL; Arao RF; Miglioretti DL; Henderson LM; Buist DS; Onega T; Rauscher GH; Lee JM; Tosteson AN; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD;
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 28244803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiologist Characteristics Associated with Interpretive Performance of Screening Mammography: A National Mammography Database (NMD) Study.
    Lee CS; Moy L; Hughes D; Golden D; Bhargavan-Chatfield M; Hemingway J; Geras A; Duszak R; Rosenkrantz AB
    Radiology; 2021 Sep; 300(3):518-528. PubMed ID: 34156300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.
    Barlow WE; Chi C; Carney PA; Taplin SH; D'Orsi C; Cutter G; Hendrick RE; Elmore JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1840-50. PubMed ID: 15601640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
    Smith-Bindman R; Chu P; Miglioretti DL; Quale C; Rosenberg RD; Cutter G; Geller B; Bacchetti P; Sickles EA; Kerlikowske K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 15741572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Lehman CD; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 27918707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of screening mammography using single versus independent double interpretation.
    Taplin SH; Rutter CM; Elmore JG; Seger D; White D; Brenner RJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 May; 174(5):1257-62. PubMed ID: 10789773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiologists' interpretive skills in screening vs. diagnostic mammography: are they related?
    Elmore JG; Cook AJ; Bogart A; Carney PA; Geller BM; Taplin SH; Buist DS; Onega T; Lee CI; Miglioretti DL
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1096-1103. PubMed ID: 27438069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening mammographic performance by race and age in the National Mammography Database: 29,479,665 screening mammograms from 13,181,241 women.
    Lee CS; Goldman L; Grimm LJ; Liu IX; Simanowith M; Rosenberg R; Zuley M; Moy L
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Feb; 203(3):599-612. PubMed ID: 37897646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.