These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18544797)

  • 1. An analytical layered forward model for breasts in electrical impedance tomography.
    Kulkarni R; Boverman G; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Kao TJ; Newell JC
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S27-40. PubMed ID: 18544797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Layered model for breasts in electrical impedance tomography.
    Kulkarni R; Boverman G; Isaacson D; Saulnier G; Newell JC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4150-3. PubMed ID: 18002916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A two-layered forward model of tissue for electrical impedance tomography.
    Kulkarni R; Kao TJ; Boverman G; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S19-34. PubMed ID: 19491444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An iterative Newton-Raphson method to solve the inverse admittivity problem.
    Edic PM; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Jain H; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Jul; 45(7):899-908. PubMed ID: 9644899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A reconstruction algorithm for breast cancer imaging with electrical impedance tomography in mammography geometry.
    Choi MH; Kao TJ; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Apr; 54(4):700-10. PubMed ID: 17405377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A versatile high-permittivity phantom for EIT.
    Kao TJ; Saulnier GJ; Isaacson D; Szabo TL; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Nov; 55(11):2601-7. PubMed ID: 18990630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency-difference EIT (fdEIT) using weighted difference and equivalent homogeneous admittivity: validation by simulation and tank experiment.
    Jun SC; Kuen J; Lee J; Woo EJ; Holder D; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Oct; 30(10):1087-99. PubMed ID: 19738319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of admittivity anomaly on high-contrast heterogeneous backgrounds using frequency difference EIT.
    Jang J; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2015 Jun; 36(6):1179-92. PubMed ID: 26008619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrode boundary conditions and experimental validation for BEM-based EIT forward and inverse solutions.
    Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH; Isaacson D; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Sep; 25(9):1180-8. PubMed ID: 16967803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effective admittivity of biological tissues as a coefficient of elliptic PDE.
    Seo JK; Bera TK; Kwon H; Sadleir R
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():353849. PubMed ID: 23710251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The boundary element method in the forward and inverse problem of electrical impedance tomography.
    de Munck JC; Faes TJ; Heethaar RM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jun; 47(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 10833854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite element modeling of electrode-skin contact impedance in electrical impedance tomography.
    Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Apr; 40(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 8375870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental justification for using 3D conductivity reconstructions in electrical impedance tomography.
    Halter RJ; Hartov A; Paulsen KD
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S115-27. PubMed ID: 17664629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Excitation patterns in three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Dehghani H; Soni N; Halter R; Hartov A; Paulsen KD
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S185-97. PubMed ID: 15798231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast EIT using a new projected image reconstruction method with multi-frequency measurements.
    Lee E; Ts ME; Seo JK; Woo EJ
    Physiol Meas; 2012 May; 33(5):751-65. PubMed ID: 22532397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An efficient forward solver in electrical impedance tomography by spectral element method.
    Lim KH; Lee JH; Ye G; Liu QH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Aug; 25(8):1044-51. PubMed ID: 16894997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Error analysis of nonconstant admittivity for MR-based electric property imaging.
    Seo JK; Kim MO; Lee J; Choi N; Woo EJ; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Kim DH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Feb; 31(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 21990329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast imaging using electrical impedance tomography: correlation of quantitative assessment with visual interpretation.
    Zain NM; Chelliah KK
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(3):1327-31. PubMed ID: 24606460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of layers in imaging brain function using electrical impedance tomograghy.
    Liston AD; Bayford RH; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2004 Feb; 25(1):143-58. PubMed ID: 15005312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.