These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18544798)

  • 1. Magneto-acousto-electrical tomography: a potential method for imaging current density and electrical impedance.
    Haider S; Hrbek A; Xu Y
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S41-50. PubMed ID: 18544798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Difference frequency magneto-acousto-electrical tomography (DF-MAET): application of ultrasound-induced radiation force to imaging electrical current density.
    Renzhiglova E; Ivantsiv V; Xu Y
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Nov; 57(11):2391-402. PubMed ID: 21041128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imaging electrical impedance from acoustic measurements by means of magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction (MAT-MI).
    Li X; Xu Y; He B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Feb; 54(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 17278589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
    Woo EJ; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numerical implementation of magneto-acousto-electrical tomography (MAET) using a linear phased array transducer.
    Gözü MS; Zengin R; Gençer NG
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035012. PubMed ID: 29372692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of the secondary process on mass point vibration velocity propagation in magneto-acoustic tomography and magneto-acousto-electrical tomography.
    Sun Z; Liu G; Guo L; Xia H; Wang X
    Technol Health Care; 2016 Apr; 24 Suppl 2():S683-9. PubMed ID: 27177099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magneto-Acousto-Electrical Tomography With Magnetic Induction for Conductivity Reconstruction.
    Guo L; Liu G; Xia H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Sep; 62(9):2114-24. PubMed ID: 25532166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Image reconstruction of conductivity on magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction].
    Li J; Yin T; Liu Z; Xu G
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Apr; 27(2):416-20. PubMed ID: 20481330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconstruction of conductivity using the dual-loop method with one injection current in MREIT.
    Lee TH; Nam HS; Lee MG; Kim YJ; Woo EJ; Kwon OI
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7523-39. PubMed ID: 21098919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reconstruction of the shape of conductivity spectra using differential multi-frequency magnetic induction tomography.
    Brunner P; Merwa R; Missner A; Rosell J; Hollaus K; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S237-48. PubMed ID: 16636414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of recoverable current from one component of magnetic flux density in MREIT and MRCDI.
    Park C; Lee BI; Kwon OI
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3001-13. PubMed ID: 17505085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Errors due to measuring voltage on current-carrying electrodes in electric current computed tomography.
    Cheng KS; Simske SJ; Isaacson D; Newell JC; Gisser DG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Jan; 37(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 2303271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation on magnetoacoustic signal generation with magnetic induction and its application to electrical conductivity reconstruction.
    Ma Q; He B
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):5085-99. PubMed ID: 17671355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design of a microscopic electrical impedance tomography system using two current injections.
    Liu Q; Oh TI; Wi H; Lee EJ; Seo JK; Woo EJ
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Sep; 32(9):1505-16. PubMed ID: 21828912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method of the forward problem for magneto-acousto-electrical tomography.
    Lv J; Liu G; Wang X; Xia H
    Technol Health Care; 2016 Apr; 24 Suppl 2():S733-8. PubMed ID: 27177104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrical impedance tomography via filtered-back projection of fan current distribution: a numerical simulation.
    De Simone BC; Siciliano R; Pachi' A; Cametti C; De Luca F
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2002 Oct; 23(7):516-21. PubMed ID: 12224055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimization of multi-angle Magneto-Acousto-Electrical Tomography (MAET) based on a numerical method.
    Sun T; Zeng X; Hao PH; Chin CT; Chen M; Yan JJ; Dai M; Lin HM; Chen S; Chen X
    Math Biosci Eng; 2020 Mar; 17(4):2864-2880. PubMed ID: 32987504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noninvasive imaging of bioimpedance distribution by means of current reconstruction magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography.
    Gao N; He B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 May; 55(5):1530-8. PubMed ID: 18440899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Theoretical limits to sensitivity and resolution in magneto-acousto-electrical tomography.
    Ghalichi E; Güneri Gençer N
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(20):8025-8040. PubMed ID: 28749379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimization of multiply acquired magnetic flux density B(z) using ICNE-Multiecho train in MREIT.
    Nam HS; Kwon OI
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 May; 55(9):2743-59. PubMed ID: 20400810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.