244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18544810)
1. Direct EIT Jacobian calculations for conductivity change and electrode movement.
Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S89-99. PubMed ID: 18544810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reconstruction of conductivity changes and electrode movements based on EIT temporal sequences.
Dai T; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S77-88. PubMed ID: 18544802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shape deformation in two-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
Boyle A; Adler A; Lionheart WR
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Dec; 31(12):2185-93. PubMed ID: 22711769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images.
Boyle A; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 21646710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The boundary element method in the forward and inverse problem of electrical impedance tomography.
de Munck JC; Faes TJ; Heethaar RM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jun; 47(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 10833854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. GREIT: a unified approach to 2D linear EIT reconstruction of lung images.
Adler A; Arnold JH; Bayford R; Borsic A; Brown B; Dixon P; Faes TJ; Frerichs I; Gagnon H; Gärber Y; Grychtol B; Hahn G; Lionheart WR; Malik A; Patterson RP; Stocks J; Tizzard A; Weiler N; Wolf GK
Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S35-55. PubMed ID: 19491438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tracking boundary movement and exterior shape modelling in lung EIT imaging.
Biguri A; Grychtol B; Adler A; Soleimani M
Physiol Meas; 2015 Jun; 36(6):1119-35. PubMed ID: 26007150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reconstruction of the shape of conductivity spectra using differential multi-frequency magnetic induction tomography.
Brunner P; Merwa R; Missner A; Rosell J; Hollaus K; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S237-48. PubMed ID: 16636414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accounting for hardware imperfections in EIT image reconstruction algorithms.
Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S13-27. PubMed ID: 17664631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electromagnetic impedance tomography (EMIT): a new method for impedance imaging.
Levy S; Adam D; Bresler Y
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):676-87. PubMed ID: 12166865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrical impedance tomography of human brain function using reconstruction algorithms based on the finite element method.
Bagshaw AP; Liston AD; Bayford RH; Tizzard A; Gibson AP; Tidswell AT; Sparkes MK; Dehghani H; Binnie CD; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):752-64. PubMed ID: 14568449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimizing EIT image artefacts from mesh variability in finite element models.
Adler A; Lionheart WR
Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):823-34. PubMed ID: 21646712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impedance imaging of lung ventilation: do we need to account for chest expansion?
Adler A; Guardo R; Berthiaume Y
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Apr; 43(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 8626190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An iterative Newton-Raphson method to solve the inverse admittivity problem.
Edic PM; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Jain H; Newell JC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Jul; 45(7):899-908. PubMed ID: 9644899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
Woo EJ; Seo JK
Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of incompatible boundary information in EIT on the convergence behavior of an iterative algorithm.
Tang M; Wang W; Wheeler J; McCormick M; Dong X
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):620-8. PubMed ID: 12166858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
