242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18545052)
1. Failure causes, timing, and cluster behavior: an 8-year study of dental implants.
Schwartz-Arad D; Laviv A; Levin L
Implant Dent; 2008 Jun; 17(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 18545052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immediate occlusal loading of implants in the partially edentate mandible: a prospective 1-year radiographic and 4-year clinical study.
Ostman PO; Hellman M; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 18548929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Private practice results of screw-type tapered implants: survival and evaluation of risk factors.
Mundt T; Mack F; Schwahn C; Biffar R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):607-14. PubMed ID: 16955613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A retrospective analysis of patients referred for implant placement to a specialty clinic: indications, surgical procedures, and early failures.
Bornstein MM; Halbritter S; Harnisch H; Weber HP; Buser D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19216281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 5-year clinical experience with BTI dental implants: risk factors for implant failure.
Anitua E; Orive G; Aguirre JJ; Ardanza B; Andía I
J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 35(8):724-32. PubMed ID: 18616758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of osteoporotic status on the survival of titanium dental implants.
Holahan CM; Koka S; Kennel KA; Weaver AL; Assad DA; Regennitter FJ; Kademani D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):905-10. PubMed ID: 19014161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrospective analysis of 110 zygomatic implants in a single-stage immediate loading protocol.
Balshi SF; Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 19492650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study.
Jensen OT; Cullum DR; Baer D
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1921-30. PubMed ID: 19686930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part I: implant loss and associations to various factors.
Roos-Jansåker AM; Lindahl C; Renvert H; Renvert S
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Apr; 33(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 16553637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between implant stability measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and bone loss during early healing period.
Yang SM; Shin SY; Kye SB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):e12-9. PubMed ID: 18230372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Provisional implants for immediate restoration of partially edentulous jaws: a clinical study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):717-25. PubMed ID: 18807570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Immediate loading of splinted locking-taper implants: 1-year survival estimates and risk factors for failure.
Erakat MS; Chuang SK; Yoo RH; Weed M; Dodson TB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 18416418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of dental implant survival.
Dodson TB
J Mass Dent Soc; 2006; 54(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16536162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dental implants placed in previously failed sites: survival rate and factors affecting the outcome.
Machtei EE; Mahler D; Oettinger-Barak O; Zuabi O; Horwitz J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 18177430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate provisionalization of single-tooth implants in fresh-extraction sites at the maxillary esthetic zone: up to 6 years of follow-up.
Mijiritsky E; Mardinger O; Mazor Z; Chaushu G
Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):326-33. PubMed ID: 19667821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new approach to rehabilitate the severely atrophic maxilla using extramaxillary anchored implants in immediate function: a pilot study.
Maló P; Nobre Mde A; Lopes I
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Nov; 100(5):354-66. PubMed ID: 18992569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-year prospective clinical comparison of immediate replacement vs. immediate restoration of single tooth in the esthetic zone.
Palattella P; Torsello F; Cordaro L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1148-53. PubMed ID: 18983318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla including immediate fixed provisional restoration without the use of bone grafting: a review of 1-year outcome data from a long-term prospective clinical trial.
Toljanic JA; Baer RA; Ekstrand K; Thor A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):518-26. PubMed ID: 19587876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immediate functional loading of TiOblast dental implants in full-arch edentulous maxillae: a 3-year prospective study.
Collaert B; De Bruyn H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1254-60. PubMed ID: 19040440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
