These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62. Using referral letters to measure quality and performance in general practice. Montalto M J Qual Clin Pract; 1995 Mar; 15(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 7757325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The state of general practice--not all for the better. Howie J; Metcalfe D; Walker J BMJ; 2008 Jun; 336(7656):1310. PubMed ID: 18535076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Qualifications and quality of care. Lancet; 1991 Jun; 337(8753):1352. PubMed ID: 1674331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Quality in general practice. Lancet; 1972 Sep; 2(7778):650. PubMed ID: 4116791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Quality and Outcomes Framework: time to take stock. Ashworth M; Kordowicz M Br J Gen Pract; 2010 Sep; 60(578):637-8. PubMed ID: 20849690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice. Kosecoff J; Kanouse DE; Rogers WH; McCloskey L; Winslow CM; Brook RH JAMA; 1987 Nov; 258(19):2708-13. PubMed ID: 3499522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Auditing and evaluation in general practice. Mourin K J R Coll Gen Pract; 1976 Oct; 26(171):726-33. PubMed ID: 1003383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Quality in general practice. Lancet; 1972 Aug; 2(7774):411-2. PubMed ID: 4115229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Quality of care of musculoskeletal conditions. Rothschild BM Rheumatology (Oxford); 2003 May; 42(5):703; author reply 703-4. PubMed ID: 12709559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Reaccreditation: the why, what and how questions. Stanley I; al-Shehri A Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Dec; 43(377):524-9. PubMed ID: 8312025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Report from the U.K. King's Fund Centre. Criteria for change: the history and impact of consensus development conferences in the United Kingdom. Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1994; 10(1):202-3. PubMed ID: 8157456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Quality and outcomes framework. So what are we to do? Roscoe TJ BMJ; 2007 Dec; 335(7631):1170. PubMed ID: 18063619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Quality of care in general practice. A delphi study of indicators and methods. Moussa A; Bridges-Webb C Aust Fam Physician; 1994 Mar; 23(3):465-8, 472-3. PubMed ID: 8048881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. The quality of obstetric care in family practice: are family physicians as safe as obstetricians? Mengel MB; Phillips WR J Fam Pract; 1987 Feb; 24(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 3806027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Outcome of obstetric care in family practice. Curtis P J Fam Pract; 1979 Feb; 8(2):245-6, 250. PubMed ID: 429969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Advantages of general practice. Duncan MH Nature; 1994 Sep; 371(6493):98. PubMed ID: 8072554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. [Quality development in family practice--development and use of health indicators]. Carlsen T; Claudi T; Cooper J; Telje J; Waaler HM Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1996 Sep; 116(23):2787-90. PubMed ID: 8928166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. The Mackenzie Report: general practice in UK medical schools. Lancet; 1986 May; 1(8492):1253-4. PubMed ID: 2872396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]