These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18546432)

  • 1. Mathematical description of competition between two and three bacterial species under dual substrate limitation in the chemostat: a comparison with experimental data.
    Gottschal JC; Thingstad TF
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1982 Jun; 24(6):1403-18. PubMed ID: 18546432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel concept combining experimental and mathematical analysis for the identification of unknown interspecies effects in a mixed culture.
    Schmidt JK; Riedele C; Regestein L; Rausenberger J; Reichl U
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2011 Aug; 108(8):1900-11. PubMed ID: 21391206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of a three bacteria mixed culture in a chemostat: evaluation and application of a quantitative terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis for absolute and species specific cell enumeration.
    Schmidt JK; König B; Reichl U
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Mar; 96(4):738-56. PubMed ID: 16937400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting stability of mixed microbial cultures from single species experiments: 1. Phenomenological model.
    Pilyugin SS; Reeves GT; Narang A
    Math Biosci; 2004 Dec; 192(2):85-109. PubMed ID: 15627488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting stability of mixed microbial cultures from single species experiments: 2. Physiological model.
    Pilyugin SS; Reeves GT; Narang A
    Math Biosci; 2004 Dec; 192(2):111-36. PubMed ID: 15627489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ideal free distribution and bacterial growth on two substrates.
    Krivan V
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Mar; 69(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 16271736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The steady states of microbial growth on mixtures of substitutable substrates in a chemostat.
    Narang A
    J Theor Biol; 1998 Feb; 190(3):241-61. PubMed ID: 9514652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Competition between two microbial populations in a sequencing fed-batch reactor: theory, experimental verification, and implications for waste treatment applications.
    Dikshitulu S; Baltzis BC; Lewandowski GA; Pavlou S
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1993 Aug; 42(5):643-56. PubMed ID: 18613087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coexistence of S. cerevisiae and E. coli in chemostat under substrate competition and product inhibition.
    Davison BH; Stephanopoulos G
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1986 Nov; 28(11):1742-52. PubMed ID: 18555289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Competitive growth of Gordonia and Acinetobacter in continuous flow aerobic and anaerobic/aerobic reactors.
    Kim H; Pagilla KR
    J Biosci Bioeng; 2003; 95(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 16233460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative analysis of some models of gene regulation in mixed-substrate microbial growth.
    Narang A
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Sep; 242(2):489-501. PubMed ID: 16650437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A mathematical model for microbial growth under limitation by conservative substrates.
    Nyholm N
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1976 Aug; 18(8):1043-56. PubMed ID: 953167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bacterial gene regulation in diauxic and non-diauxic growth.
    Narang A; Pilyugin SS
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan; 244(2):326-48. PubMed ID: 16989865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bacterial physiology, regulation and mutational adaptation in a chemostat environment.
    Ferenci T
    Adv Microb Physiol; 2008; 53():169-229. PubMed ID: 17707145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The dynamics of single-substrate continuous cultures: the role of ribosomes.
    Gupta S; Pilyugin SS; Narang A
    J Theor Biol; 2005 Feb; 232(4):467-90. PubMed ID: 15588630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial microbial distributions of nitrifiers and heterotrophs in mixed-population biofilms.
    Okabe S; Hiratia K; Ozawa Y; Watanabe Y
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1996 Apr; 50(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 18626896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Competition between two microbial populations in a nonmixed environment: effect of cell random motility.
    Lauffenburger D; Calcagno P B
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1983 Sep; 25(9):2103-25. PubMed ID: 18574811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of Bacteriophages on the Population Dynamics of Four Strains of Pelagic Marine Bacteria.
    Middelboe M; Hagström A; Blackburn N; Sinn B; Fischer U; Borch NH; Pinhassi J; Simu K; Lorenz MG
    Microb Ecol; 2001 Oct; 42(3):395-406. PubMed ID: 12024264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the coexistence of competing microbial species in a chemostat under cycling.
    Pavlou S; Kevrekidis IG; Lyberatos G
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1990 Feb; 35(3):224-32. PubMed ID: 18592514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complex dynamics of microbial competition in the gradostat.
    Gaki A; Theodorou A; Vayenas DV; Pavlou S
    J Biotechnol; 2009 Jan; 139(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 18809443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.