These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18546544)
41. US and UK health economics: two disciplines separated by a common language? Newhouse JP Health Econ; 1998 Aug; 7 Suppl 1():S79-92. PubMed ID: 9744718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. How does the persistence of depression influence the continuity and type of health insurance and coverage limits on mental health therapy? Masaquel A; Wells K; Ettner SL J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2007 Sep; 10(3):133-44. PubMed ID: 17890830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Linear and nonlinear growth models: describing a Bayesian perspective. Depaoli S; Boyajian J J Consult Clin Psychol; 2014 Oct; 82(5):784-802. PubMed ID: 24364797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparing alternative models: log vs Cox proportional hazard? Basu A; Manning WG; Mullahy J Health Econ; 2004 Aug; 13(8):749-65. PubMed ID: 15322988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform? Manning WG; Mullahy J J Health Econ; 2001 Jul; 20(4):461-94. PubMed ID: 11469231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Estimation of Controlled Direct Effects in Longitudinal Mediation Analyses with Latent Variables in Randomized Studies. Loh WW; Moerkerke B; Loeys T; Poppe L; Crombez G; Vansteelandt S Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(5):763-785. PubMed ID: 31726876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Strengthening causal inference in studies using non-experimental data: an application of propensity score and instrumental variable methods]. Kim MH; Do YK J Prev Med Public Health; 2007 Nov; 40(6):495-504. PubMed ID: 18063905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia. Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Isolating the effect of major depression on obesity: role of selection bias. Dave DM; Tennant J; Colman G J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2011 Dec; 14(4):165-86. PubMed ID: 22345359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A comparison of the variance estimation methods for heteroscedastic nonlinear models. Sidik K; Jonkman JN Stat Med; 2016 Nov; 35(26):4856-4874. PubMed ID: 27383279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Estimating linear regression models in the presence of a censored independent variable. Austin PC; Hoch JS Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(3):411-29. PubMed ID: 14748036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist's dream? HernĂ¡n MA; Robins JM Epidemiology; 2006 Jul; 17(4):360-72. PubMed ID: 16755261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Sample size importantly limits the usefulness of instrumental variable methods, depending on instrument strength and level of confounding. Boef AG; Dekkers OM; Vandenbroucke JP; le Cessie S J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 67(11):1258-64. PubMed ID: 25124167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Econometric modeling of health care costs and expenditures: a survey of analytical issues and related policy considerations. Mullahy J Med Care; 2009 Jul; 47(7 Suppl 1):S104-8. PubMed ID: 19536020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The instrumental variable method to study self-selection mechanism: a case of influenza vaccination. Yoo BK; Frick KD Value Health; 2006; 9(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 16626415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Performance evaluation of kinetic parameter estimation methods in dynamic FDG-PET studies. Dai X; Chen Z; Tian J Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Jan; 32(1):4-16. PubMed ID: 21166088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Use of instrumental variables for endogenous treatment at the provider level. Konetzka RT; Yang F; Werner RM Health Econ; 2019 May; 28(5):710-716. PubMed ID: 30672042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A primer on marginal effects--Part I: Theory and formulae. Onukwugha E; Bergtold J; Jain R Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Jan; 33(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 25189459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Unstable inferences? An examination of complex survey sample design adjustments using the Current Population Survey for health services research. Davern M; Jones A; Lepkowski J; Davidson G; Blewett LA Inquiry; 2006; 43(3):283-97. PubMed ID: 17176970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Selecting polychoric instrumental variables in confirmatory factor analysis: An alternative specification test and effects of instrumental variables. Jin S; Cao C Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):387-413. PubMed ID: 29323415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]