These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18546658)

  • 41. Stereoscopic illusory contours--cortical neuron responses and human perception.
    Heider B; Spillmann L; Peterhans E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):1018-29. PubMed ID: 12419125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Reverse correlation reveals how observers sample visual information when estimating three-dimensional shape.
    Scarfe P; Hibbard PB
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 86():115-27. PubMed ID: 23665429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Who owns the contour of a visual hole?
    Bertamini M
    Perception; 2006; 35(7):883-94. PubMed ID: 16970198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The Leaning Tower illusion is not a simple perspective illusion.
    Maniatis LM
    Perception; 2008; 37(11):1769-72; discussion 1773-5. PubMed ID: 19189738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Depth from binocular half-occlusions in stereoscopic images of natural scenes.
    Wilcox LM; Lakra DC
    Perception; 2007; 36(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 17718362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis.
    Grove PM; Brooks KR; Anderson BL; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1695-705; discussion 1706. PubMed ID: 16009392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Monocular occlusions determine the perceived shape and depth of occluding surfaces.
    Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
    J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):11. PubMed ID: 20884560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Further consideration of size illusions in random dot stereograms.
    Greene E; Gentner S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Aug; 93(1):205-12. PubMed ID: 11693687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Infants Perceive Three-Dimensional Illusory Contours as Occluding Surfaces.
    Kavšek M; Marks E
    Child Dev; 2015; 86(6):1865-76. PubMed ID: 26362954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The role of stereopsis, motion parallax, perspective and angle polarity in perceiving 3-D shape.
    Sherman A; Papathomas TV; Jain A; Keane BP
    Seeing Perceiving; 2012; 25(3-4):263-85. PubMed ID: 21771395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Seeing double and depth with Wheatstone's stereograms.
    Ono H; Lillakas L; Wade NJ
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1611-23. PubMed ID: 18265842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Shading and stereo in early perception of shape and reflectance.
    Sun J; Perona P
    Perception; 1997; 26(4):519-29. PubMed ID: 9404497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. How does binocular rivalry emerge from cortical mechanisms of 3-D vision?
    Grossberg S; Yazdanbakhsh A; Cao Y; Swaminathan G
    Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2232-50. PubMed ID: 18640145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. T-junctions and perceived slant of partially occluded surfaces.
    Grove PM; Ono H; Kaneko H
    Perception; 2003; 32(12):1451-64. PubMed ID: 14992423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Illusory depth perception of oblique lines produced by overlaid vertical disparity.
    Ito H
    Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(7):931-42. PubMed ID: 15644231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The stroboscopic Pulfrich effect is not evidence for the joint encoding of motion and depth.
    Read JC; Cumming BG
    J Vis; 2005 May; 5(5):417-34. PubMed ID: 16097873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Concave and convex phases in ambiguous figures showing colour shifts. Mach's figure and the AMBEGUJAS phenomenon.
    Bergström SS; Gustafsson KA
    Perception; 2011; 40(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 21513182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Infant perception of von Szily contours.
    Kavšek M; Braun S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Aug; 184():82-97. PubMed ID: 31015100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Random dot stereograms and the limits of their detectability].
    Pittke EC
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Apr; 192(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 3404945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Phantom surfaces in da Vinci stereopsis.
    Wardle SG; Gillam BJ
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):16. PubMed ID: 23397041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.