These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18546776)

  • 1. Comparison of computed radiography and conventional radiography in detection of small volume pneumoperitoneum.
    Marolf A; Blaik M; Ackerman N; Watson E; Gibson N; Thompson M
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2008; 49(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 18546776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
    Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The left lateral projection is comparable to horizontal beam radiography for identifying experimental small volume pneumoperitoneum in the canine abdomen.
    Ng J; Linn KA; Shmon CL; Parker S; Zwicker LA
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2020 Mar; 61(2):130-136. PubMed ID: 31845411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of computed tomography, computed radiography, and film-screen radiography for the detection of canine pulmonary nodules.
    Alexander K; Joly H; Blond L; D'Anjou MA; Nadeau MÈ; Olive J; Beauchamp G
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2012; 53(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 22413954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computed radiography versus screen-film mammography in detection of simulated microcalcifications: a receiver operating characteristic study based on phantom images.
    Shaw CC; Wang T; King JL; Breitenstein DS; Chang TS; Harris KM; Baratz AB; Ganott MA; Reginella R; Sumkin JH; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Mar; 5(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 9522883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of flat-panel digital to conventional film-screen radiography in detection of experimentally created lesions of the equine third metacarpal bone.
    Moorman VJ; Marshall JF; Devine DV; Payton M; Jann HW; Bahr R
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2009; 50(6):577-83. PubMed ID: 19999339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
    Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interstitial lung disease: impact of postprocessing in digital storage phosphor imaging.
    Schaefer CM; Greene R; Llewellyn HJ; Mrose HE; Pile-Spellman EA; Rubens JR; Lindemann SR
    Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):733-8. PubMed ID: 1994410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Plain and computed radiography for detecting experimentally induced pneumothorax in cadavers: implications for detection in patients.
    Carr JJ; Reed JC; Choplin RH; Pope TL; Case LD
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):193-9. PubMed ID: 1549671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: conventional radiography versus high-resolution storage-phosphor radiography--a preliminary study.
    Ikezoe J; Kohno N; Kido S; Takeuchi N; Johkoh T; Arisawa J; Kozuka T
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7734537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of simulated inflicted metaphyseal fractures in a fetal pig model: image optimization and dose reduction with computed radiography.
    Kleinman PL; Zurakowski D; Strauss KJ; Cleveland RH; Perez-Rosello JM; Nichols DP; Zou KH; Kleinman PK
    Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 18430873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
    Andriole KP
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selenium-based digital radiography in the detection of bone lesions: preliminary experience with experimentally created defects.
    Ludwig K; Link TM; Fiebich M; Renger B; Diederich S; Oelerich M; Lenzen H; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):220-4. PubMed ID: 10887251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
    Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Selenium-based digital radiography of the cervical spine: comparison with screen-film radiography for the depiction of anatomic details].
    Ludwig K; Diederich S; Wormanns D; Link TM; Lenzen H; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2002 Aug; 174(8):1028-32. PubMed ID: 12142983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Digital Tomosynthesis, Dual-Energy Radiography, and Conventional Chest Radiography for the Detection and Management of Pulmonary Nodules.
    Dobbins JT; McAdams HP; Sabol JM; Chakraborty DP; Kazerooni EA; Reddy GP; Vikgren J; Båth M
    Radiology; 2017 Jan; 282(1):236-250. PubMed ID: 27439324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain.
    Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
    J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of porcine bone lesions and fissures: comparing digital selenium, digital luminescence, and analog film-screen radiography.
    Zähringer M; Krug B; Kamm KF; Wassmer G; Hellmich M; Winnekendonk G; Andermahr J; Gossmann A; Lackner KJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Dec; 177(6):1397-403. PubMed ID: 11717093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.