946 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18546812)
1. Long-term evaluation of implant survival in augmented sinuses: a case series.
Yamamichi N; Itose T; Neiva R; Wang HL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Apr; 28(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18546812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus.
Olson JW; Dent CD; Morris HF; Ochi S
Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 11885175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maxillary sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone: a clinical report of long-term results.
Valentini P; Abensur DJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):556-60. PubMed ID: 12939008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients.
Bornstein MM; Chappuis V; von Arx T; Buser D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1034-43. PubMed ID: 18828820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement.
Tawil G; Mawla M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):713-21. PubMed ID: 11669254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite mixed with fibrin glue and later placement of nonsubmerged implants: a retrospective study in 50 patients.
Hallman M; Nordin T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 15101593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sinus grafting with a natural fluorohydroxyapatite for immediate load: a study with histologic analysis and histomorphometry.
Lee CY; Rohrer MD; Prasad HS; Stover JD; Suzuki JB
J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(4):164-75. PubMed ID: 19813420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation.
Hürzeler MB; Kirsch A; Ackermann KL; Quiñones CR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):466-75. PubMed ID: 8803342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Five-year success rate of 831 consecutively placed Zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of three different rough surfaces.
Oliva J; Oliva X; Oliva JD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 20369093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sinus augmentation bone grafts for the provision of dental implants: report of clinical outcome.
McCarthy C; Patel RR; Wragg PF; Brook IM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 12814312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histomorphometric evaluation of six dental implant surfaces after early loading in augmented human sinuses.
Todisco M; Trisi P
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(4):153-66. PubMed ID: 17009559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A review of survival rates for implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses using meta-analysis.
Tong DC; Rioux K; Drangsholt M; Beirne OR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 9581402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of implant placement after bone grafting for three-dimensional reconstruction of the posterior jaw.
Bahat O; Fontanessi RV
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Jun; 21(3):220-31. PubMed ID: 11490399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Massive sinus-lift procedures with beta-tricalcium phosphate: long-term results].
Meyer C; Chatelain B; Benarroch M; Garnier JF; Ricbourg B; Camponovo T
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Apr; 110(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 19171358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two different forms of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite in sinus augmentation and simultaneous implant placement: an experimental study.
Benlidayi ME; Kürkcü M; Oz IA; Sertdemir Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):704-11. PubMed ID: 19885412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep.
Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival of immediately loaded dental implants in deficient alveolar bone sites augmented with beta-tricalcium phosphate.
Ormianer Z; Palti A; Shifman A
Implant Dent; 2006 Dec; 15(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 17172958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus in sheep: comparative pullout study of dental implants.
Haas R; Baron M; Zechner W; Mailath-Pokorny G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):691-6. PubMed ID: 14579957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
