194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18547204)
1. Institutional review board approaches to the incidental findings problem.
Keane MA
J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):352-5, 213. PubMed ID: 18547204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Individual genetic and genomic research results and the tradition of informed consent: exploring US review board guidance.
Simon C; Shinkunas LA; Brandt D; Williams JK
J Med Ethics; 2012 Jul; 38(7):417-22. PubMed ID: 22361295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The law of incidental findings in human subjects research: establishing researchers' duties.
Wolf SM; Paradise J; Caga-anan C
J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):361-83, 214. PubMed ID: 18547206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The future of incidental findings: should they be viewed as benefits?
Parker LS
J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):341-51, 213. PubMed ID: 18547203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Researcher and institutional review board chair perspectives on incidental findings in genomic research.
Williams JK; Daack-Hirsch S; Driessnack M; Downing N; Shinkunas L; Brandt D; Simon C
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2012 Jun; 16(6):508-13. PubMed ID: 22352737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Towards a balanced approach to identifying conflicts of interest faced by institutional review boards.
Kaur S; Balan S
Theor Med Bioeth; 2015 Oct; 36(5):341-61. PubMed ID: 26438122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical standards for medical research in the Israeli military - review of the changes in the last decade.
Hassidim A; Kayouf R; Yavnai N; Panush N; Dagan D; Bader T; Hartal M
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2016; 5():53. PubMed ID: 27980720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disclosing incidental findings in brain research: the rights of minors in decision-making.
Di Pietro NC; Illes J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Nov; 38(5):1009-13. PubMed ID: 24006134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "Members of the same club": challenges and decisions faced by US IRBs in identifying and managing conflicts of interest.
Klitzman R
PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e22796. PubMed ID: 21829516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Institutional review board perspectives on obligations to disclose genetic incidental findings to research participants.
Gliwa C; Yurkiewicz IR; Lehmann LS; Hull SC; Jones N; Berkman BE
Genet Med; 2016 Jul; 18(7):705-11. PubMed ID: 26583685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 'Ethical responsibility' or 'a whole can of worms': differences in opinion on incidental finding review and disclosure in neuroimaging research from focus group discussions with participants, parents, IRB members, investigators, physicians and community members.
Cole C; Petree LE; Phillips JP; Shoemaker JM; Holdsworth M; Helitzer DL
J Med Ethics; 2015 Oct; 41(10):841-7. PubMed ID: 26063579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A qualitative study of institutional review board members' experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent.
McClure KB; Delorio NM; Schmidt TA; Chiodo G; Gorman P
J Med Ethics; 2007 May; 33(5):289-93. PubMed ID: 17470507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anticipate and communicate: Ethical management of incidental and secondary findings in the clinical, research, and direct-to-consumer contexts (December 2013 report of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues).
Weiner C
Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 180(6):562-4. PubMed ID: 25150271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Institutional Review Boards: What Clinician Researchers Need to Know.
Lapid MI; Clarke BL; Wright RS
Mayo Clin Proc; 2019 Mar; 94(3):515-525. PubMed ID: 30832791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Working with the institutional review board.
Byerly WG
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 Jan; 66(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 19139484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The risks and benefits of searching for incidental findings in MRI research scans.
Royal JM; Peterson BS
J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):305-14, 212. PubMed ID: 18547199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. US IRBs confronting research in the developing world.
Klitzman RL
Dev World Bioeth; 2012 Aug; 12(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 22515423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethical framework for the detection, management and communication of incidental findings in imaging studies, building on an interview study of researchers' practices and perspectives.
Bunnik EM; van Bodegom L; Pinxten W; de Beaufort ID; Vernooij MW
BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):10. PubMed ID: 28166795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The views of ethics committee members and medical researchers on the return of individual research results and incidental findings, ownership issues and benefit sharing in biobanking research in a South Indian city.
Vaz M; Vaz M; K S
Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Dec; 18(4):321-330. PubMed ID: 28513968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
