These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18547830)
1. Prospective changes to condylar position in symphyseal distraction osteogenesis. Landes CA; Laudemann K; Sader R; Mack M Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 18547830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of transmandibular symphyseal distraction on teeth, bone, and temporomandibular joint. Gunbay T; Akay MC; Aras A; Gomel M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2254-65. PubMed ID: 19761921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term skeletal and dental effects of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis. Del Santo M; Guerrero CA; Buschang PH; English JD; Samchukov ML; Bell WH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):485-93. PubMed ID: 11094362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term skeletal and dental stability of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis with a hybrid distractor. King JW; Wallace JC; Winter DL; Niculescu JA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jan; 141(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 22196186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis on mandibular structures. Malkoç S; Işeri H; Karaman AI; Mutlu N; Küçükkolbaşi H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):603-11. PubMed ID: 17110257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term skeletal effects of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis. An implant study. Iseri H; Malkoç S Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):512-7. PubMed ID: 16043467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term effects of symphyseal distraction and rapid maxillary expansion on pharyngeal airway dimensions, tongue, and hyoid position. Malkoç S; Uşümez S; Işeri H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):769-75. PubMed ID: 18068595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis: review of three techniques. Alkan A; Ozer M; Baş B; Bayram M; Celebi N; Inal S; Ozden B Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 36(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 17223309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of symphyseal distraction osteogenesis on the temporomandibular joint seen with magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography. Gökalp H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):689-99. PubMed ID: 18984403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skeletal and dental effects of tooth-borne versus hybrid devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis. Niculescu JA; King JW; Lindauer SJ Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 23786596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel method for measuring and monitoring monobloc distraction osteogenesis using three-dimensional computed tomography rendered images with the "biporion-dorsum sellae" plane. Part II: comparison of measurements before and after distraction. Salyer KE; Por YC; Genecov DG; Barcelo CR J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):369-76. PubMed ID: 18362713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Six year follow-up of a patient treated with mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis. Sukurica Y; Gurel HG; Mutlu N J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 38(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 19682916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of the performance of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis. Boccaccio A; Cozzani M; Pappalettere C Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 20709724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in parathyroid hormone-related protein and 3-dimensional trabecular bone structure of the mandibular condyle following mandibular distraction osteogenesis in growing rats. Shibazaki R; Maki K; Tachikawa T; Shibasaki Y; Hinton RJ; Carlson DS; Opperman LA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 63(4):505-12. PubMed ID: 15789323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Model to assess duration of distraction compared with degree of incisal crowding in symphyseal distraction osteogenesis. Savoldelli C; Chamorey E; Cizsek E; Lesne V; Manière-Ezvan A; Bettega G Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):887-91. PubMed ID: 23906850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis: a finite element study. Boccaccio A; Lamberti L; Pappalettere C; Cozzani M; Siciliani G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 18675208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Navigation-assisted mandibular body distraction osteogenesis: a preliminary study in goats. Cai M; Shen G; Cheng AH; Lin Y; Yu D; Ye M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):168.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24331570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of extraoral lateral force loading on the mandible in the mandibular development of growing rats. Ishii T; Yamaguchi H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):782-91. PubMed ID: 19061805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Remodeling of the temporomandibular joint following mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the transverse dimension. Stelnicki EJ; Stucki-McCormick SU; Rowe N; McCarthy JG Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Mar; 107(3):647-58. PubMed ID: 11304588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positional and morphologic changes of the mandibular condyle after mandibular distraction osteogenesis in skeletal class II patients. Azumi Y; Sugawara J; Takahashi I; Mitani H; Nagasaka H; Kawamura H World J Orthod; 2004; 5(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 15615140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]