These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18547836)

  • 41. Impact of ambient lighting intensity and duration on the signal-to-noise ratio of images from photostimulable phosphor plates processed using DenOptix and ScanX systems.
    Ramamurthy R; Canning CF; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):307-11. PubMed ID: 15585807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Time and motion study: a comparison of two photostimulable phosphor imaging systems used in dentistry.
    Ramamurthy R; Canning CF; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Sep; 35(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 16940478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reproducibility of pixel values for two photostimulable phosphor plates in consecutive standardized scannings.
    Freitas P; Yaedú RY; Rubira-Bullen IR; Escarpinati M; Vieira MC; Schiabel H; Lauris JR
    Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 17119702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An evaluation of microbiologic contamination on a phosphor plate system: is weekly gas sterilization enough?
    Kalathingal S; Youngpeter A; Minton J; Shrout M; Dickinson D; Plummer K; Looney S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 20060337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Disinfection of intraoral photostimulable phosphor plates with 70% ethyl alcohol and 70% isopropyl alcohol alters image contrast and produces image artifacts.
    Correia-Dantas IF; Ruiz DC; Fontenele RC; Freitas DQ; Farias-Gomes A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Dec; 136(6):741-752. PubMed ID: 37468380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Work flow with digital intraoral radiography: a systematic review.
    Wenzel A; Møystad A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2010 Mar; 68(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 20141365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Physical properties and ease of operation of a wireless intraoral x-ray sensor.
    Tsuchida R; Araki K; Endo A; Funahashi I; Okano T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 16243247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reject analysis in direct digital radiography.
    Andersen ER; Jorde J; Taoussi N; Yaqoob SH; Konst B; Seierstad T
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Mar; 53(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 22287147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Digital radiography: state of the art.
    Otis L; Mupparapu M; Mozaffari E
    Pa Dent J (Harrisb); 2000; 67(6):33-4, 42-3. PubMed ID: 11411340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A pilot study of the effects of a vacuum sealing barrier method for photostimulable phosphor plates regarding plate damage and prevention of microbiologic cross-contamination.
    Peker I; Peker E; Basman A; Akca G; Odabas ME; Haciosmanoglu N; Altunkaynak B; Akarslan Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Sep; 126(3):283-290. PubMed ID: 29958935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Quality of digital panoramic radiography in a newly established dental school.
    Kullman L; Joseph B
    Swed Dent J; 2006; 30(4):165-70. PubMed ID: 17243444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Computed Radiography Photostimulable Phosphor Plate Receptors: Effect on Grid Conversion Factors.
    Noble LB; Culp MP
    Radiol Technol; 2017 Nov; 89(2):121-126. PubMed ID: 29298916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of ring artifact correction methods for flat-detector CT.
    Prell D; Kyriakou Y; Kalender WA
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3881-95. PubMed ID: 19491452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Hypochlorous acid and white vinegar: Artifact-free COVID-19 disinfection options for photostimulable storage phosphor plates.
    Pamukcu U; Peker I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2022 Sep; 134(3):367-374. PubMed ID: 35869016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Analysis of the deterioration of photostimulable phosphor plates.
    Souza-Pinto GN; Santaella GM; Coli AA; Oenning AC; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Sep; 49(6):20190500. PubMed ID: 32302219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Digital radiography in young children. Considerations based on experiences in practice].
    Berkhout WE; Mileman PA; Weerheijm KL
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2004 Oct; 111(10):382-7. PubMed ID: 15553366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Some current legal issues that may affect oral and maxillofacial radiology. Part 2: digital monitors and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Macdonald-Jankowski DS; Orpe EC
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2007; 73(6):507-11. PubMed ID: 17672955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparison of two intraoral CCD sensor systems in terms of image quality and interobserver agreement.
    Schulze D; Rother UJ; Fuhrmann AW; Tietke M
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Apr; 6(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 14552151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of 3 different disinfection methods on the image quality of photostimulable phosphor plates.
    Buchanan A; Ghosh S; Kalathingal S; Dalsania H; Raina R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 Feb; 137(2):172-181. PubMed ID: 37926603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Degradation of storage phosphor images due to scanning delay.
    Akdeniz BG; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 16549432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.