These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18547836)

  • 81. ScanX Swift™: comfortable, convenient, affordable PSP digital imaging.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014; 35(10):780. PubMed ID: 25742681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Exposure indicator degradation from CR plate processing delays.
    Kowalczyk N; Comer E
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(5):401-9. PubMed ID: 19457844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Numerical Evaluation of Image Contrast for Thicker and Thinner Objects among Current Intraoral Digital Imaging Systems.
    Dashpuntsag O; Yoshida M; Kasai R; Maeda N; Hosoki H; Honda E
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():5215413. PubMed ID: 28497053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Spiral imaging artifact reduction: a comparison of two k-trajectory measurement methods.
    Lechner SM; Sipilä PT; Wiesinger F; Kerr AB; Vogel MW
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jun; 29(6):1485-92. PubMed ID: 19472426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Assessing the validity of modulation transfer function evaluation techniques with application to small area and scanned digital detectors.
    Price BD; Esbrand CJ; Olivo A; Gibson AP; Hebden JC; Speller RD; Royle GJ
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2008 Nov; 79(11):113103. PubMed ID: 19045885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Speed of sound imaging: improved image quality in breast sonography.
    Barr RG; Rim A; Graham R; Berg W; Grajo JR
    Ultrasound Q; 2009 Sep; 25(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 19730076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. How Does Ambient Light Affect the Image Quality of Phosphor Plate Digital Radiography? A Quantitative Analysis Using Contemporary Digital Radiographic Systems.
    Sampaio-Oliveira M; Marinho-Vieira LE; Wanderley VA; Ambrosano GMB; Pauwels R; Oliveira ML
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(22):. PubMed ID: 36433224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Comparison of the efficacy and technical accuracy of different rectangular collimators for intraoral radiography.
    Zhang W; Abramovitch K; Thames W; Leon IL; Colosi DC; Goren AD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e22-8. PubMed ID: 19464209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. A clinical trial of the Nomad portable X-ray unit.
    Brooks SL; McMinn WE; Benavides E
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 91(2):54-8. PubMed ID: 19288662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Comparison of two digital intraoral radiography imaging systems as a function of contrast resolution and exposure time.
    Aydin KC; Demirel O; Özcan M
    Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Jun; 69(3):148-152. PubMed ID: 32610723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Flexible phosphor sensors: a digital supplement or option to rigid sensors.
    Glazer HS
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014; 35(7):512-6. PubMed ID: 25198879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Real-time digital signal processing for live electro-optic imaging.
    Sasagawa K; Kanno A; Tsuchiya M
    Opt Express; 2009 Aug; 17(18):15641-51. PubMed ID: 19724563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Acquisition-related motion compensation for digital subtraction angiography.
    Ionasec RI; Heigl B; Hornegger J
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Jun; 33(4):256-66. PubMed ID: 19231134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. The influence of tube potential on periodontal bone level measurements and subjective image quality using a digital photostimulable storage phosphor sensor.
    Vandenberghe B; Jacobs R
    J Oral Maxillofac Res; 2010; 1(1):e5. PubMed ID: 24421961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Computed tomographic metal artifact reduction for the detection and quantitation of small features near large metallic implants: a comparison of published methods.
    Rinkel J; Dillon WP; Funk T; Gould R; Prevrhal S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):621-9. PubMed ID: 18664852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Technical Performance of Universal and Enhanced Intraoral Imaging Rectangular Collimators.
    Johnson KB; Mauriello SM; Ludlow JB; Platin E
    J Dent Hyg; 2015 Aug; 89(4):238-46. PubMed ID: 26304948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Oblique laterals.
    Dalley K
    Br Dent J; 2009 Jun; 206(12):607. PubMed ID: 19557039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Artifacts in digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Patient discomfort and cross-infection control in bitewing examination with a storage phosphor plate and a CCD-based sensor.
    Wenzel A; Frandsen E; Hintze H
    J Dent; 1999 Mar; 27(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 10079631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Digital images obtained with a digital camera are not associated with a loss of critical information--a preliminary study.
    Peretz B; Kaffe I; Amir E
    Br Dent J; 2009 Mar; 206(5):E9; discussion 268-9. PubMed ID: 19265830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.