150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18547837)
1. Diagnosis of artificially induced external root resorption using conventional intraoral film radiography, CCD, and PSP: an ex vivo study.
Kamburoğlu K; Tsesis I; Kfir A; Kaffe I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Dec; 106(6):885-91. PubMed ID: 18547837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of conventional film with different digital and digitally filtered images in the detection of simulated internal resorption cavities--an ex vivo study in human cadaver jaws.
Kamburoğlu K; Barenboim SF; Kaffe I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):790-7. PubMed ID: 17942339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnosis of simulated external root resorption using conventional intraoral film radiography, CCD, PSP, and CBCT: a comparison study.
Shokri A; Mortazavi H; Salemi F; Javadian A; Bakhtiari H; Matlabi H
Biomed J; 2013; 36(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 23515150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conventional and digital radiographic methods in the detection of simulated external root resorptions: a comparative study.
Westphalen VP; Gomes de Moraes I; Westphalen FH; Martins WD; Souza PH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jul; 33(4):233-5. PubMed ID: 15533976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Observer ability to detect ex vivo simulated internal or external cervical root resorption.
Kamburoğlu K; Kurşun S; Yüksel S; Oztaş B
J Endod; 2011 Feb; 37(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 21238797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of digital with conventional radiography in detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: an ex vivo study.
Tsesis I; Kamburoğlu K; Katz A; Tamse A; Kaffe I; Kfir A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 18299217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiography for the detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption.
Durack C; Patel S; Davies J; Wilson R; Mannocci F
Int Endod J; 2011 Feb; 44(2):136-47. PubMed ID: 21083575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Souza PC; Willems G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):764.e1-11; discussion 764-5. PubMed ID: 19962592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of simulated internal resorption cavities using digital and digital subtraction radiography: a comparative study.
Stephanopoulos G; Mikrogeorgis G; Lyroudia K
Dent Traumatol; 2011 Oct; 27(5):344-9. PubMed ID: 21762378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative analysis of apical root resorption by means of digital subtraction radiography.
Heo MS; Lee SS; Lee KH; Choi HM; Choi SC; Park TW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):369-73. PubMed ID: 11250638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between intraoral indirect and conventional film-based imaging for the detection of dental root fractures: an ex vivo study.
Shintaku WH; Venturin JS; Noujeim M; Dove SB
Dent Traumatol; 2013 Dec; 29(6):445-9. PubMed ID: 23566073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of limited cone-beam computed tomography in the detection of horizontal root fracture.
Kamburoğlu K; Ilker Cebeci AR; Gröndahl HG
Dent Traumatol; 2009 Jun; 25(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 19583573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption.
Lermen CA; Liedke GS; da Silveira HE; da Silveira HL; Mazzola AA; de Figueiredo JA
J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 20857012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
Anissi HD; Geibel MA
Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient comfort in periapical examination using digital receptors.
Gonçalves A; Wiezel VG; Gonçalves M; Hebling J; Sannomiya EK
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):484-8. PubMed ID: 19767521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiographs in diagnosis of lingual-simulated external root resorptions.
Bernardes RA; de Paulo RS; Pereira LO; Duarte MA; Ordinola-Zapata R; de Azevedo JR
Dent Traumatol; 2012 Aug; 28(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 22233265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film.
Kambungton J; Janhom A; Prapayasatok S; Pongsiriwet S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Feb; 41(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 22301636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of conventional and digital radiography in detecting external root resorption.
Mesgarani A; Haghanifar S; Ehsani M; Yaghub SD; Bijani A
Iran Endod J; 2014; 9(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 25386202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proximal caries detection: Sirona Sidexis versus Kodak Ektaspeed Plus.
Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Caplan D
Gen Dent; 2005; 53(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15779222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
