384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18548920)
1. Evaluation of gold-machined UCLA-type abutments and CAD/CAM titanium abutments with hexagonal external connection and with internal connection.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 18548920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro evaluation of titanium, zirconia, and alumina procera abutments with hexagonal connection.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 16955608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of the dimensions and abutment rotational freedom of gold-machined 3i UCLA-type abutments in the as-received condition, after casting with a noble metal alloy and porcelain firing.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 11105010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro evaluation of ZiReal abutments with hexagonal connection: in original state and following abutment preparation.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 15747681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of implant/abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability.
Binon PP
Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 8639238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the fit of CAD/CAM abutments.
Hamilton A; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Evans C
Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(4):370-80. PubMed ID: 23837169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A clinical study of the efficacy of gold-tite square abutment screws in cement-retained implant restorations.
Drago CJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 12705307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of material selection on the passivity of fit of implant-supported restorations created with computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture.
Karl M; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):739-45. PubMed ID: 21841982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
Cibirka RM; Nelson SK; Lang BR; Rueggeberg FA
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of casting procedures on rotational misfit in castable abutments.
Kano SC; Binon PP; Bonfante G; Curtis DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):575-9. PubMed ID: 17929518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
Goossens IC; Herbst D
SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Strength of CAD/CAM-generated esthetic ceramic molar implant crowns.
Wolf D; Bindl A; Schmidlin PR; Lüthy H; Mörmann WH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 18807555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems.
Lang LA; Sierraalta M; Hoffensperger M; Wang RF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):652-8. PubMed ID: 14579952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of rotational freedom of In-Ceram ceramic blank abutments before and after infiltration.
Aramouni P; Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Zebouni E; Salameh Z; Almas K
Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 20147816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
