BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

553 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18548921)

  • 1. Load fatigue performance of four implant-abutment interface designs: effect of torque level and implant system.
    Quek HC; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 18548921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical bending moment of four implant-abutment interface designs.
    Lee FK; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):744-51. PubMed ID: 20657869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
    Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs.
    Khraisat A; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):604-10. PubMed ID: 12488853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Load fatigue performance of a single-tooth implant abutment system: effect of diameter.
    Quek CE; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):929-36. PubMed ID: 17190303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Micromotion and dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface.
    Gratton DG; Aquilino SA; Stanford CM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11174678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter.
    Tan BF; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):648-58. PubMed ID: 15508980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants.
    Steinebrunner L; Wolfart S; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1276-84. PubMed ID: 19040443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Load fatigue performance of two implant-abutment combinations.
    Basten CH; Nicholls JI; Daly CH; Taggart R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):522-8. PubMed ID: 8803348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.
    Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 11432656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abutment rotational displacement of external hexagon implant system under lateral cyclic loading.
    Khraisat A; Baqain ZH; Smadi L; Nomura S; Miyakawa O; Elnasser Z
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 16774595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
    Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of eliminating implant/abutment rotational misfit on screw joint stability.
    Binon PP; McHugh MJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 9171488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
    Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of clockwise and counterclockwise twisting moments on abutment screw loosening.
    Yao KT; Kao HC; Cheng CK; Fang HW; Yip SW; Hsu ML
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1181-6. PubMed ID: 22092296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strength and mode of failure of single implant all-ceramic abutment restorations under static load.
    Tripodakis AP; Strub JR; Kappert HF; Witkowski S
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 10348596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.