150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18548957)
1. Screening and enrolling subjects in a randomized clinical trial involving implant dentures.
Walton JN; MacEntee MI
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):210-4. PubMed ID: 18548957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.
Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Choosing or refusing oral implants: a prospective study of edentulous volunteers for a clinical trial.
Walton JN; MacEntee MI
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(6):483-8. PubMed ID: 16335167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implant overdentures for edentulous elders: study of patient preference.
Esfandiari S; Lund JP; Penrod JR; Savard A; Thomason JM; Feine JS
Gerodontology; 2009 Mar; 26(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 18498362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a retrospective study.
Siadat H; Alikhasi M; Mirfazaelian A; Geramipanah F; Zaery F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 18462205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Solutions for severely angulated implants in the mandibular overdenture: a clinical report.
Akkad S; Richards M
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 19054301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial.
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible.
Gallucci GO; Doughtie CB; Hwang JW; Fiorellini JP; Weber HP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):601-7. PubMed ID: 19302389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.
Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex differences in denture satisfaction.
Pan S; Awad M; Thomason JM; Dufresne E; Kobayashi T; Kimoto S; Wollin SD; Feine JS
J Dent; 2008 May; 36(5):301-8. PubMed ID: 18394770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prosthetic treatment time and satisfaction of edentulous patients treated with conventional or implant-stabilized complete mandibular dentures: a case-control study (part 2).
Hobkirk JA; Abdel-Latif HH; Howlett J; Welfare R; Moles DR
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 19260422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Provisional implants for immediate restoration of partially edentulous jaws: a clinical study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):717-25. PubMed ID: 18807570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prosthetic treatment time and satisfaction of edentulous patients treated with conventional or implant-supported complete mandibular dentures: a case-control study (part 1).
Hobkirk JA; Abdel-Latif HH; Howlett J; Welfare R; Moles DR
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):489-95. PubMed ID: 19149063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of implant support on distal-extension removable partial dentures: in vivo assessment.
Ohkubo C; Kobayashi M; Suzuki Y; Hosoi T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1095-101. PubMed ID: 19216279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient-based assessment of the outcomes of implant therapy: a review of the literature.
Locker D
Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):453-61. PubMed ID: 9922737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized controlled clinical trial on satisfaction with resilient denture liners among edentulous patients.
Kimoto S; Kitamura M; Kodaira M; Yamamoto S; Ohno Y; Kawai Y; Kawara M; Kobayashi K
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 15119878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
