205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18548962)
1. Magnetic retention and bar-clip attachment for implant-retained auricular prostheses: a comparative analysis.
de Sousa AA; Mattos BS
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 18548962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrospective study of treatment outcomes with implant-retained extraoral prostheses: survival rates and prosthetic complications.
Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 20141816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retention and load transfer characteristics of implant-retained auricular prostheses.
Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Baba T; Caputo AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 17622002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical evaluation of craniofacial osseointegration retention systems.
Del Valle V; Faulkner G; Wolfaardt J; Rangert B; Tan HK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 7672853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Alternative retention for an implant-retained auricular prosthesis.
Mekayarajjananonth T; LoCascio SJ; Winkler S; Salinas TJ; Guerra LR
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 12498442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retention force and fatigue strength of overdenture attachment systems.
Botega DM; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Sep; 31(9):884-9. PubMed ID: 15369470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments.
Petropoulos VC; Smith W; Kousvelari E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 9109267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention and Mechanical Behavior of Attachment Systems for Implant-Retained Auricular Prostheses.
Sigua-Rodriguez EA; Goulart DR; Santos ZT; Alvarez-Pinzon N; Olate S; de Albergaria-Barbosa JR
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 28(1):134-138. PubMed ID: 27922962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant-retained auricular prosthesis.
Demir N; Malkoc MA; Ozturk AN; Tosun Z
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1795-7. PubMed ID: 21119423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Photoelastic analysis of implant-retained and conventional obturator prostheses with different attachment systems and soft relining.
do Prado Ribeiro P; Goiato MC; Pellizzer EP; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF; de Carvalho Dekon SF; dos Santos DM
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 May; 22(3):797-800. PubMed ID: 21558947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of retentive anchor systems for overdentures.
Svetlize CA; Bodereau EF
Quintessence Int; 2004 Jun; 35(6):443-8. PubMed ID: 15202589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional improvement of implant-retained ear epistheses with magnets and a retention clasp.
Pröbster L; Bootz F; Weber H; Zugaro C
Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 7710626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant-supported facial prostheses.
Baima RF
J Mich Dent Assoc; 1996; 78(4):50-4, 56-64. PubMed ID: 9520655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnet-retained auricular prosthesis with an implant-supported composite bar: a clinical report.
Chung RW; Siu AS; Chu FC; Chow TW
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):446-9. PubMed ID: 12806320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bar-clip versus magnet-retained auricular prostheses: A prospective clinical study with a 3-year follow-up.
Visser A; Noorda WD; Linde A; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):240-247. PubMed ID: 31810618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implant-retained auricular prostheses: an assessment of implant success and prosthetic complications.
Aydin C; Karakoca S; Yilmaz H; Yilmaz C
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):241-4. PubMed ID: 18548964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.
Evtimovska E; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 19500236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
