483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18548965)
21. Enamel wear of modified porcelains.
Imai Y; Suzuki S; Fukushima S
Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 11764126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Tolerance test of five different types of crowns on single-tooth implants.
Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Rasmusson L
Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 9728117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Confocal examination of subsurface cracking in ceramic materials.
Etman MK
J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):550-9. PubMed ID: 19486458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays after six years: wear of luting composites.
Krämer N; Frankenberger R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):466-72. PubMed ID: 11203858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs.
Ozcan M; Niedermeier W
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):299-302. PubMed ID: 12066495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns.
Limkangwalmongkol P; Kee E; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 19178619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In vivo wear ranking of some restorative materials.
Dahl BL; Oilo G
Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):561-5. PubMed ID: 7568705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold.
Elmaria A; Goldstein G; Vijayaraghavan T; Legeros RZ; Hittelman EL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 17098498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An in vitro study to investigate the load at fracture of Procera AllCeram crowns with various thickness of occlusal veneer porcelain.
Harrington Z; McDonald A; Knowles J
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 12675456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods.
Heintze SD; Zellweger G; Cavalleri A; Ferracane J
Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 16087228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.
Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET
Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel.
Kadokawa A; Suzuki S; Tanaka T
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 17052470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An intraindividual clinical comparison of 2 metal-ceramic systems.
Bergman B; Marklund S; Nilson H; Hedlund SO
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(5):444-7. PubMed ID: 10709527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of framework design on the cervical color of metal ceramic crowns.
Paniz G; Kim Y; Abualsaud H; Hirayama H
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):310-8. PubMed ID: 22024181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F
J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Resistance to staining, flexural strength, and chemical solubility of core porcelains for all-ceramic crowns.
Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Chai J; Sansano S; Shonberg D
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 11484579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Procera: a new way to achieve an all-ceramic crown.
Andersson M; Razzoog ME; Odén A; Hegenbarth EA; Lang BR
Quintessence Int; 1998 May; 29(5):285-96. PubMed ID: 9693647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of finish line design on marginal adaptation of electroformed metal-ceramic crowns.
Shiratsuchi H; Komine F; Kakehashi Y; Matsumura H
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 16543022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical study to evaluate the wear of natural enamel antagonist to zirconia and metal ceramic crowns.
Mundhe K; Jain V; Pruthi G; Shah N
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 25985742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
