These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18548965)

  • 41. Photoconductive method for measuring light transmission to the root of metal-ceramic and all-ceramic restorations.
    Hsieh YL; Lai YL; Chen HL; Hung CY; Chen XL; Lee SY
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1230-5. PubMed ID: 18372037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
    Rahme HY; Adib SM; Zebouni EA; Bechara BB; Rifai KT
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Relative wear of enamel opposing low-fusing dental porcelain.
    Clelland NL; Agarwala V; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 14508738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns.
    Boening KW; Wolf BH; Schmidt AE; Kästner K; Walter MH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 11044849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A prospective 10-year study of metal ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prosthesis retainers in private practice settings.
    Reitemeier B; Hänsel K; Kastner C; Weber A; Walter MH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 23522363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Esthetic restorative materials and opposing enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Marques MM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 18505225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinical evaluation of ceramic veneered titanium restorations according to the Procera technique.
    Lövgren R; Andersson B; Bergøvist S; Carlsson GE; Ekström PF; Odman P; Sundqvist B
    Swed Dent J; 1997; 21(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 9178444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Wear evaluation of MZ100 compared to ceramic CAD/CAM materials.
    Kunzelmann KH; Jelen B; Mehl A; Hickel R
    Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Jul; 4(3):171-84. PubMed ID: 11862884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Quantitative measurement of marginal disintegration of ceramic inlays.
    Hayashi M; Tsubakimoto Y; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14753325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure.
    Kinsel RP; Lin D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 19463666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Twenty-year follow-up of metal-ceramic single crowns: a retrospective study.
    Näpänkangas R; Raustia A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 18717088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of margin angles of collarless metal ceramic restorations.
    Dalvit DL; Parker MH; Cameron SM; Hawkins MC; Agar JR; Brousseau JS
    Gen Dent; 2004; 52(2):148-50. PubMed ID: 15101310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Fracture resistance of metal- and galvano-ceramic crowns cemented with different luting cements: in vitro comparative study.
    Ghazy MH; Madina MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):610-2. PubMed ID: 17165302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Prospective clinical 5-year study of ceramic-veneered titanium restorations with the Procera system.
    Lövgren R; Andersson B; Carlsson GE; Odman P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):514-21. PubMed ID: 11105007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Wear of enamel opposing low-fusing and conventional ceramic restorative materials.
    Clelland NL; Agarwala V; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Mar; 10(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11406790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Changes in the outcome of metal-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns and FDPs following the introduction of osseointegrated implant dentistry into a prosthodontic practice.
    Walton TR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 19548408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Investigation of human enamel wear against four dental ceramics and gold.
    al-Hiyasat AS; Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Gilmour WH
    J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):487-95. PubMed ID: 9699442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Wear of posterior metal-free polymer crowns after 2 years.
    Ohlmann B; Trame JP; Dreyhaupt J; Gabbert O; Koob A; Rammelsberg P
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):782-8. PubMed ID: 18482349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Finite element analysis of stress distribution of 2 different tooth preparation designs in porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns.
    Oyar P; Ulusoy M; Eskitascioglu G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 16479766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.