132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18549264)
1. PhosphoScan: a probability-based method for phosphorylation site prediction using MS2/MS3 pair information.
Wan Y; Cripps D; Thomas S; Campbell P; Ambulos N; Chen T; Yang A
J Proteome Res; 2008 Jul; 7(7):2803-11. PubMed ID: 18549264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Confident site localization using a simulated phosphopeptide spectral library.
Suni V; Imanishi SY; Maiolica A; Aebersold R; Corthals GL
J Proteome Res; 2015 May; 14(5):2348-59. PubMed ID: 25774671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic validation of phosphopeptide identifications by the MS2/MS3 target-decoy search strategy.
Jiang X; Han G; Feng S; Jiang X; Ye M; Yao X; Zou H
J Proteome Res; 2008 Apr; 7(4):1640-9. PubMed ID: 18314942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phosphopeptide Enrichment and LC-MS/MS Analysis to Study the Phosphoproteome of Recombinant Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells.
Henry M; Coleman O; Prashant ; Clynes M; Meleady P
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1603():195-208. PubMed ID: 28493132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confident phosphorylation site localization using the Mascot Delta Score.
Savitski MM; Lemeer S; Boesche M; Lang M; Mathieson T; Bantscheff M; Kuster B
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2011 Feb; 10(2):M110.003830. PubMed ID: 21057138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reference-facilitated phosphoproteomics: fast and reliable phosphopeptide validation by microLC-ESI-Q-TOF MS/MS.
Imanishi SY; Kochin V; Ferraris SE; de Thonel A; Pallari HM; Corthals GL; Eriksson JE
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2007 Aug; 6(8):1380-91. PubMed ID: 17510049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colander: a probability-based support vector machine algorithm for automatic screening for CID spectra of phosphopeptides prior to database search.
Lu B; Ruse CI; Yates JR
J Proteome Res; 2008 Aug; 7(8):3628-34. PubMed ID: 18563924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prophossi: automating expert validation of phosphopeptide-spectrum matches from tandem mass spectrometry.
Martin DM; Nett IR; Vandermoere F; Barber JD; Morrice NA; Ferguson MA
Bioinformatics; 2010 Sep; 26(17):2153-9. PubMed ID: 20651112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fragment Mass Spectrum Prediction Facilitates Site Localization of Phosphorylation.
Yang Y; Horvatovich P; Qiao L
J Proteome Res; 2021 Jan; 20(1):634-644. PubMed ID: 32985198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiplexed quantitative phosphoproteomics of cell line and tissue samples.
Kreuzer J; Edwards A; Haas W
Methods Enzymol; 2019; 626():41-65. PubMed ID: 31606085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accurate phosphorylation site localization using phospho-brackets.
Xiao K; Shen Y; Li S; Tian Z
Anal Chim Acta; 2017 Dec; 996():38-47. PubMed ID: 29137706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Classification filtering strategy to improve the coverage and sensitivity of phosphoproteome analysis.
Jiang X; Ye M; Han G; Dong X; Zou H
Anal Chem; 2010 Jul; 82(14):6168-75. PubMed ID: 20568719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mining phosphopeptide signals in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data for protein phosphorylation analysis.
Wu HY; Tseng VS; Liao PC
J Proteome Res; 2007 May; 6(5):1812-21. PubMed ID: 17402769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic validation of phosphopeptide identifications from tandem mass spectra.
Lu B; Ruse C; Xu T; Park SK; Yates J
Anal Chem; 2007 Feb; 79(4):1301-10. PubMed ID: 17297928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous quantification of protein phosphorylation sites using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomics: a linear algebra approach for isobaric phosphopeptides.
Xu F; Yang T; Sheng Y; Zhong T; Yang M; Chen Y
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):5452-60. PubMed ID: 25403019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of alternative MS/MS and bioinformatics approaches for confident phosphorylation site localization.
Wiese H; Kuhlmann K; Wiese S; Stoepel NS; Pawlas M; Meyer HE; Stephan C; Eisenacher M; Drepper F; Warscheid B
J Proteome Res; 2014 Feb; 13(2):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24364495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of data-dependent and -independent mass spectrometric workflows for sensitive quantification of proteins and phosphorylation sites.
Bauer M; Ahrné E; Baron AP; Glatter T; Fava LL; Santamaria A; Nigg EA; Schmidt A
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):5973-88. PubMed ID: 25330945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MS3-IDQ: Utilizing MS3 Spectra beyond Quantification Yields Increased Coverage of the Phosphoproteome in Isobaric Tag Experiments.
Berberich MJ; Paulo JA; Everley RA
J Proteome Res; 2018 Apr; 17(4):1741-1747. PubMed ID: 29461835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phosphorylation-specific MS/MS scoring for rapid and accurate phosphoproteome analysis.
Payne SH; Yau M; Smolka MB; Tanner S; Zhou H; Bafna V
J Proteome Res; 2008 Aug; 7(8):3373-81. PubMed ID: 18563926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of TripleTOF spectral simulation and library searching for confident localization of phosphorylation sites.
Takai A; Tsubosaka T; Hirano Y; Hayakawa N; Tani F; Haapaniemi P; Suni V; Imanishi SY
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225885. PubMed ID: 31790495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
