273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1854934)
1. Denta Scan: CT software program used in the anatomic evaluation of the mandible and maxilla in the perspective of endosseous implant surgery.
Casselman JW; Deryckere F; Hermans R; Declercq C; Neyt L; Pattyn G; Meeus L; Vandevoorde P; Steyaert L; Devos V
Rofo; 1991 Jul; 155(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 1854934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT in the preoperative assessment of the mandible and maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Work in progress.
Rothman SL; Chaftez N; Rhodes ML; Schwarz MS
Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):171-5. PubMed ID: 3380955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Diagnostic contribution of CT in implantology: use of a new Denta-Scan reconstruction program].
Villari N; Fanfani F
Radiol Med; 1992 May; 83(5):608-14. PubMed ID: 1631337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery.
Tal H; Moses O
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 1884852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
Garg AK; Vicari A
Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Denta Scan: programme of x-ray computed tomographic reconstruction used for the anatomical evaluation of the mandible and maxilla in preoperative assessment of dental implants].
Casselman JW; Deryckère F; Robert Y; Declercq C; Neyt L
Ann Radiol (Paris); 1990; 33(7-8):408-17. PubMed ID: 2095694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement.
Gher ME; Richardson AC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Jun; 15(3):268-83. PubMed ID: 7558660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dental implant imaging: TeraRecon's Dental 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography System.
Garg AK
Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Jun; 18(6):41-5. PubMed ID: 17682685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant radiography.
Friedland B
J Mass Dent Soc; 2003; 51(4):14-7. PubMed ID: 12677638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Restricting preoperative diagnosis to two-dimensional images in oral implantology can potentially cause implant failures.
Almog DM
Alpha Omegan; 2010 Dec; 103(4):136-40. PubMed ID: 21313964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.
Hanazawa T; Sano T; Seki K; Okano T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 15008935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
Reddy MS; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Vanderven FJ; Jeffcoat MK
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Dec; 5(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7640337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region.
Mehra A; Pai KM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 19673959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computed tomography: Part I. Preoperative assessment of the mandible for endosseous implant surgery.
Schwarz MS; Rothman SL; Rhodes ML; Chafetz N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1987; 2(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 3481354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed tomography in the preoperative planning of oral endo-osseous implant surgery.
Lamoral Y; Quirynen M; Peene P; Vanneste F; Lemahieu SF; Baert AL; van Steenberghe D
Rofo; 1990 Nov; 153(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 2173053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional computer tomography (CT) in the evaluation of placement for dental implants.
Lee CY
Hawaii Dent J; 1996; 27(3):26-9. PubMed ID: 11908285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of panoramic radiography in determination of neurosensory disturbances related to dental implant placement in posterior mandible.
Kütük N; Gönen ZB; Yaşar MT; Demirbaş AE; Alkan A
Implant Dent; 2014 Dec; 23(6):648-52. PubMed ID: 25365650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perioperative validation of localisation of the mental foramen.
Bou Serhal C; Jacobs R; Flygare L; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 11803387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
