These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18550026)

  • 1. On the reliability of the occlusion technique as a tool for the assessment of the HMI of in-vehicle information and communication systems.
    Gelau C; Henning MJ; Krems JF
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Mar; 40(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 18550026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of in-vehicle HMI using occlusion techniques: experimental results and practical implications.
    Baumann M; Keinath A; Krems JF; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2004 May; 35(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 15145282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The occlusion technique: a procedure to assess the HMI of in-vehicle information and communication systems.
    Gelau C; Krems JF
    Appl Ergon; 2004 May; 35(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 15145280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practical issues in the application of occlusion to measure visual demands imposed on drivers by in-vehicle tasks.
    Brook-Carter N; Stevens A; Reed N; Thompson S
    Ergonomics; 2009 Feb; 52(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 18651286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using naturalistic driving films as a design tool for investigating driver requirements in HMI design for ADAS.
    Wang M; Sun D; Chen F
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4205-12. PubMed ID: 22317367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Driving, navigation, and vehicular technology: experiences of older drivers and their co-pilots.
    Vrkljan BH; Polgar JM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2007 Dec; 8(4):403-10. PubMed ID: 17994495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Virtual prototyping and testing of in-vehicle interfaces.
    Bullinger HJ; Dangelmaier M
    Ergonomics; 2003 Jan; 46(1-3):41-51. PubMed ID: 12554397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The implications of cross-regional differences for the design of In-vehicle Information Systems: a comparison of Australian and Chinese drivers.
    Young KL; Rudin-Brown CM; Lenné MG; Williamson AR
    Appl Ergon; 2012 May; 43(3):564-73. PubMed ID: 21944830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automotive HMI design and participatory user involvement: review and perspectives.
    François M; Osiurak F; Fort A; Crave P; Navarro J
    Ergonomics; 2017 Apr; 60(4):541-552. PubMed ID: 27167154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skill acquisition while operating in-vehicle information systems: interface design determines the level of safety-relevant distractions.
    Jahn G; Krems JF; Gelau C
    Hum Factors; 2009 Apr; 51(2):136-51. PubMed ID: 19653479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Reliability design and analysis of man-machine performance of display and illumination system in cockpit].
    Wu W; Jiang G; Liao G; Zhong H; Mu X; Wang Y
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 1998 Feb; 11(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 11541272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of menu structure and touch screen scrolling style on the variability of glance durations during in-vehicle visual search tasks.
    Kujala T; Saariluoma P
    Ergonomics; 2011 Aug; 54(8):716-32. PubMed ID: 21846310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A contextual study of police car telematics: the future of in-car information systems.
    Hampton P; Langham M
    Ergonomics; 2005 Feb; 48(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 15764311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Driver-Vehicle-Environment monitoring for on-board driver support systems: lessons learned from design and implementation.
    Amditis A; Pagle K; Joshi S; Bekiaris E
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Mar; 41(2):225-35. PubMed ID: 19423076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perspectives on occlusion and requirements for validation.
    Lansdown TC; Burns PC; Parkes AM
    Appl Ergon; 2004 May; 35(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 15145285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. To twist or poke? A method for identifying usability issues with the rotary controller and touch screen for control of in-vehicle information systems.
    Harvey C; Stanton NA; Pickering CA; McDonald M; Zheng P
    Ergonomics; 2011 Jul; 54(7):609-25. PubMed ID: 21770749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A two-dimensional weighting function for a driver assistance system.
    de Winter JC; Mulder M; van Paassen MM; Abbink DA; Wieringa PA
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2008 Feb; 38(1):189-95. PubMed ID: 18270090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A usability evaluation toolkit for In-Vehicle Information Systems (IVISs).
    Harvey C; Stanton NA; Pickering CA; McDonald M; Zheng P
    Appl Ergon; 2011 May; 42(4):563-74. PubMed ID: 21036347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Battery electric vehicles - implications for the driver interface.
    Neumann I; Krems JF
    Ergonomics; 2016 Mar; 59(3):331-43. PubMed ID: 26444273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AE special issue on "driver modelling in automotive systems".
    Cacciabue PC; Carsten O; Tango F
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Mar; 41(2):177-8. PubMed ID: 19362702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.