719 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18550180)
1. Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs.
Benito-Orejas JI; Ramírez B; Morais D; Almaraz A; Fernández-Calvo JL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Aug; 72(8):1193-201. PubMed ID: 18550180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response.
Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Ho GM; Fu TY; Bruna S; Lin G
Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols.
Vohr BR; Oh W; Stewart EJ; Bentkover JD; Gabbard S; Lemons J; Papile LA; Pye R
J Pediatr; 2001 Aug; 139(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 11487750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Newborn hearing screening: costs of establishing a program.
Lemons J; Fanaroff A; Stewart EJ; Bentkover JD; Murray G; Diefendorf A
J Perinatol; 2002 Mar; 22(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 11896516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements.
Meier S; Narabayashi O; Probst R; Schmuziger N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 15183584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of two hearing screening protocols in NICU in Shanghai.
Xu ZM; Cheng WX; Yang XL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Oct; 75(10):1225-9. PubMed ID: 21802153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An alternative strategy for universal infant hearing screening in tertiary hospitals with a high delivery rate, within a developing country, using transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem evoked response audiometry.
Mathur NN; Dhawan R
J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Jul; 121(7):639-43. PubMed ID: 17112395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of automated auditory brainstem responses and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions for universal newborn hearing screening.
Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Lyra C; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E
Med Sci Monit; 2006 Jun; 12(6):CR260-3. PubMed ID: 16733484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Universal newborn hearing screening: a 27-month experience in the French region of Champagne-Ardenne.
Lévêque M; Schmidt P; Leroux B; Danvin JB; Langagne T; Labrousse M; Chays A
Acta Paediatr; 2007 Aug; 96(8):1150-4. PubMed ID: 17578491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Neonatal hearing screening. A comparison of automatic auditory brainstem audiometry and otoacoustic emissions].
Pedersen L; Møller TR; Wetke R; Ovesen T
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Feb; 170(8):642-6. PubMed ID: 18364157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response.
Suppiej A; Rizzardi E; Zanardo V; Franzoi M; Ermani M; Orzan E
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 17317296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. reducing false positives in newborn hearing screening program: how and why.
Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Lin HY; Lin G
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):788-92. PubMed ID: 17948357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening for early detection of permanent congenital hearing loss in Lagos, Nigeria.
Olusanya BO; Wirz SL; Luxon LM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jul; 72(7):991-1001. PubMed ID: 18433883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The performance of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response in the same ear of the babies in neonatal unit.
Abdul Wahid SN; Md Daud MK; Sidek D; Abd Rahman N; Mansor S; Zakaria MN
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1366-9. PubMed ID: 22770594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Follow-up default in a hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening programme in a low-income country.
Olusanya BO
Child Care Health Dev; 2009 Mar; 35(2):190-8. PubMed ID: 19228154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When should automatic Auditory Brainstem Response test be used for newborn hearing screening?
Unlu I; Guclu E; Yaman H
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2015 Jun; 42(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 25459495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Universal hearing screening in the Champagne-Ardenne regions: results and consideration after 55 000 births from January 2004 to June 2007].
Langagne T; Schmidt P; Leveque M; Chays A
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2008; 129(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 19694157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Newborn hearing screening programme outcomes in a research hospital from Turkey.
Tasci Y; Muderris II; Erkaya S; Altinbas S; Yucel H; Haberal A
Child Care Health Dev; 2010 May; 36(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 20015280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening strategies for neonatal hearing loss: which test is best?
Dort JC; Tobolski C; Brown D
J Otolaryngol; 2000 Aug; 29(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 11003070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes with OAE and AABR screening in the first 48 h--Implications for newborn hearing screening in developing countries.
van Dyk M; Swanepoel de W; Hall JW
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jul; 79(7):1034-40. PubMed ID: 25921078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
