These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18550231)

  • 1. Issues and practices in the use of effects data from FREDERICA in the ERICA Integrated Approach.
    Garnier-Laplace J; Copplestone D; Gilbin R; Alonzo F; Ciffroy P; Gilek M; Agüero A; Björk M; Oughton DH; Jaworska A; Larsson CM; Hingston JL
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1474-83. PubMed ID: 18550231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An overview of the ERICA Integrated Approach to the assessment and management of environmental risks from ionising contaminants.
    Larsson CM
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1364-70. PubMed ID: 18261830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The development and purpose of the FREDERICA radiation effects database.
    Copplestone D; Hingston J; Real A
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1456-63. PubMed ID: 18343542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of the ERICA Integrated Approach to the Drigg coastal sand dunes.
    Wood MD; Marshall WA; Beresford NA; Jones SR; Howard BJ; Copplestone D; Leah RT
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1484-95. PubMed ID: 18450343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ERICA Tool.
    Brown JE; Alfonso B; Avila R; Beresford NA; Copplestone D; Pröhl G; Ulanovsky A
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1371-83. PubMed ID: 18329765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Addressing uncertainties in the ERICA Integrated Approach.
    Oughton DH; Agüero A; Avila R; Brown JE; Copplestone D; Gilek M
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1384-92. PubMed ID: 18508164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context (protect): proposed numerical benchmark values.
    Andersson P; Garnier-Laplace J; Beresford NA; Copplestone D; Howard BJ; Howe P; Oughton D; Whitehouse P
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1100-8. PubMed ID: 19589629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision-making in environmental radiation protection: using the ERICA Integrated Approach.
    Zinger I; Copplestone D; Howard BJ
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1510-8. PubMed ID: 18395308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ERICA Integrated Approach and its contribution to protection of the environment from ionising radiation.
    Howard BJ; Larsson CM
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1361-3. PubMed ID: 18539370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multi-criteria weight of evidence approach for deriving ecological benchmarks for radioactive substances.
    Garnier-Laplace J; Della-Vedova C; Andersson P; Copplestone D; Cailes C; Beresford NA; Howard BJ; Howe P; Whitehouse P
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Jun; 30(2):215-33. PubMed ID: 20530866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Derivation of transfer parameters for use within the ERICA Tool and the default concentration ratios for terrestrial biota.
    Beresford NA; Barnett CL; Howard BJ; Scott WA; Brown JE; Copplestone D
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1393-407. PubMed ID: 18406022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transfer of radionuclides in aquatic ecosystems--default concentration ratios for aquatic biota in the Erica Tool.
    Hosseini A; Thørring H; Brown JE; Saxén R; Ilus E
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1408-29. PubMed ID: 18343543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiological risk assessment: an overview of the ERICA Integrated Approach and the ERICA Tool use.
    Prlić I; Mostečak A; Mihić MS; Veinović Ž; Pavelić L
    Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 2017 Dec; 68(4):298-307. PubMed ID: 29337685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Principles and issues in radiological ecological risk assessment.
    Jones D; Domotor S; Higley K; Kocher D; Bilyard G
    J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):19-39. PubMed ID: 12590068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A possible approach for the assessment of radiation effects on populations of wild organisms in radionuclide-contaminated environments?
    Woodhead DS
    J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):181-213. PubMed ID: 12590077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protection of the environment: how to position radioprotection in an ecological risk assessment perspective.
    Bréchignac F
    Sci Total Environ; 2003 May; 307(1-3):35-54. PubMed ID: 12711424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental biodosimetry: a biologically relevant tool for ecological risk assessment and biomonitoring.
    Ulsh B; Hinton TG; Congdon JD; Dugan LC; Whicker FW; Bedford JS
    J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):121-39. PubMed ID: 12590073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stakeholder interaction within the ERICA Integrated Approach.
    Zinger I; Oughton DH; Jones SR
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1503-9. PubMed ID: 18342412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modelling the propagation of effects of chronic exposure to ionising radiation from individuals to populations.
    Alonzo F; Hertel-Aas T; Gilek M; Gilbin R; Oughton DH; Garnier-Laplace J
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1464-73. PubMed ID: 18314232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing radiation impact at a protected coastal sand dune site: an intercomparison of models for estimating the radiological exposure of non-human biota.
    Wood MD; Beresford NA; Barnett CL; Copplestone D; Leah RT
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1034-52. PubMed ID: 19447531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.