These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18551470)

  • 1. Fetal sensory-elicited body movements differ in breech compared to cephalic position.
    Van der Meulen JA; Davies GA; Kisilevsky BS
    Dev Psychobiol; 2008 Jul; 50(5):530-4. PubMed ID: 18551470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does intra-uterine environment influence fetal head-position preference? A comparison between breech and cephalic presentation.
    Fong BF; Savelsbergh GJ; van Geijn HP; de Vries JI
    Early Hum Dev; 2005 Jun; 81(6):507-17. PubMed ID: 15935928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An exploratory study of fetal behavior at 33 and 36 weeks gestational age in hypertensive women.
    Warner J; Hains SM; Kisilevsky BS
    Dev Psychobiol; 2002 Sep; 41(2):156-68. PubMed ID: 12209657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combination of vibroacoustic stimulation and acute variables of mFBP as a simple assessment method of low-risk fetuses.
    Petrović O; Finderle A; Prodan M; Skunca E; Prpić I; Zaputović S
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Feb; 22(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 19253163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal responses to different intensity levels of vibroacoustic stimulation.
    Yao QW; Jakobsson J; Nyman M; Rabaeus H; Till O; Westgren M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb; 75(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 2300347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal behavior in diabetic and nondiabetic pregnant women: An exploratory study.
    Allen CL; Kisilevsky BS
    Dev Psychobiol; 1999 Jul; 35(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 10397898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of fetal heart rate patterns using nonlinear dynamics in breech versus cephalic presentation at term.
    Park YS; Ryu KY; Shim SS; Hoh JK; Park MI
    Early Hum Dev; 2013 Feb; 89(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 22959071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Controlled acoustic and photic stimulation of the fetus in the last pregnancy trimester].
    Boos R; Gnirs J; Auer L; Schmidt W
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1987; 191(4):154-61. PubMed ID: 3687152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulation of human fetuses with sound and vibration.
    Gagnon R
    Semin Perinatol; 1989 Oct; 13(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 2683110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moxibustion for breech presentation.
    Budd S
    Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery; 2000 Nov; 6(4):176-9. PubMed ID: 11858300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Changing fetal position through maternal posture].
    Zhao XB; Shan JZ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1993 Sep; 28(9):517-9, 567. PubMed ID: 8313740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fetal leg posture in uncomplicated breech and cephalic pregnancies.
    Fong BF; Savelsbergh GJ; de Vries JI
    Eur J Pediatr; 2009 Apr; 168(4):443-7. PubMed ID: 18661151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal motor activity in breech presentation.
    Luterkort M; Marsál K
    Early Hum Dev; 1985 Jan; 10(3-4):193-200. PubMed ID: 3987572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation test: vibrator response characteristics in pregnant sheep postmortem.
    Peters AJ; Abrams RM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Feb; 81(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 8423945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Determining factors for the success of external cephalic version: a retrospective study of 439 cases].
    Faron G; Vokaer A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Sep; 37(5):493-8. PubMed ID: 18187265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breech presentation and the use of moxibustion.
    Mitchell M; Allen K
    Pract Midwife; 2008 May; 11(5):22-4. PubMed ID: 18540504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Position of the vibroacoustic stimulator does not affect fetal response.
    Eller DP; Robinson LJ; Newman RB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Oct; 167(4 Pt 1):1137-9. PubMed ID: 1415406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vibroacoustic-induced fetal movement: two stimuli and two methods of scoring.
    Kisilevsky BS; Kilpatrick KL; Low JA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Feb; 81(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 8423943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal habituation correlates with functional brain development.
    Morokuma S; Fukushima K; Kawai N; Tomonaga M; Satoh S; Nakano H
    Behav Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 153(2):459-63. PubMed ID: 15265643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vibroacoustic stimulation in normal term human pregnancy.
    D'Elia A; Pighetti M; Vanacore F; Fabbrocini G; Arpaia L
    Early Hum Dev; 2005 May; 81(5):449-53. PubMed ID: 15935921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.