These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18551558)

  • 1. Comparison of association methods for dense marker data.
    Bacanu SA; Nelson MR; Ehm MG
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 32(8):791-9. PubMed ID: 18551558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Circumventing multiple testing: a multilocus Monte Carlo approach to testing for association.
    McIntyre LM; Martin ER; Simonsen KL; Kaplan NL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 10861894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exhaustive allelic transmission disequilibrium tests as a new approach to genome-wide association studies.
    Lin S; Chakravarti A; Cutler DJ
    Nat Genet; 2004 Nov; 36(11):1181-8. PubMed ID: 15502828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A sliding-window weighted linkage disequilibrium test.
    Yang HC; Lin CY; Fann CS
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 30(6):531-45. PubMed ID: 16830340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On optimal gene-based analysis of genome scans.
    Bacanu SA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2012 May; 36(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 22508187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.
    de Bakker PI; Yelensky R; Pe'er I; Gabriel SB; Daly MJ; Altshuler D
    Nat Genet; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1217-23. PubMed ID: 16244653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genotype-based association test for general pedigrees: the genotype-PDT.
    Martin ER; Bass MP; Gilbert JR; Pericak-Vance MA; Hauser ER
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Nov; 25(3):203-13. PubMed ID: 14557988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detecting susceptibility genes in case-control studies using set association.
    Kim S; Zhang K; Sun F
    BMC Genet; 2003 Dec; 4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9. PubMed ID: 14975077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does strong linkage disequilibrium guarantee redundant association results?
    Nielsen DM; Suchindran S; Smith CP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 32(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 18393391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multipoint linkage analysis for a very dense set of markers.
    Bacanu SA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 29(3):195-203. PubMed ID: 16094613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Haplotypes vs single marker linkage disequilibrium tests: what do we gain?
    Akey J; Jin L; Xiong M
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Apr; 9(4):291-300. PubMed ID: 11313774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using tree-based recursive partitioning methods to group haplotypes for increased power in association studies.
    Yu K; Xu J; Rao DC; Province M
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Sep; 69(Pt 5):577-89. PubMed ID: 16138916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clustering of haplotypes based on phylogeny: how good a strategy for association testing?
    Bardel C; Darlu P; Génin E
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2006 Feb; 14(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 16306882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A general method for linkage disequilibrium correction for multipoint linkage and association.
    Kurbasic A; Hössjer O
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 32(7):647-57. PubMed ID: 18481794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power comparisons between the TDT and two likelihood-based methods.
    Slager SL; Huang J; Vieland VJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 20(2):192-209. PubMed ID: 11180446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods for handling multiple testing.
    Rice TK; Schork NJ; Rao DC
    Adv Genet; 2008; 60():293-308. PubMed ID: 18358325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of inappropriate samples in association studies by an IBS-based method considering linkage disequilibrium between genetic markers.
    Andoh M; Sato Y; Sakamoto H; Yoshida T; Ohtaki M
    J Hum Genet; 2010 Jul; 55(7):436-40. PubMed ID: 20448652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of linkage disequilibrium between markers in linkage and association analyses.
    Dupuis J; Albers K; Allen-Brady K; Cho K; Elston RC; Kappen HJ; Tang H; Thomas A; Thomson G; Tsung E; Yang Q; Zhang W; Zhao K; Zheng G; Ziegler JT
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007; 31 Suppl 1():S139-48. PubMed ID: 18046770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.