These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18552312)

  • 1. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.
    Shuman WP; Branch KR; May JM; Mitsumori LM; Lockhart DW; Dubinsky TJ; Warren BH; Caldwell JH
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 18552312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 320-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.
    Qin J; Liu LY; Meng XC; Zhang JS; Dong YX; Fang Y; Shan H
    Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 21513855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 320-detector CT coronary angiography with prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram gating in a single heartbeat: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Qin J; Liu LY; Fang Y; Zhu JM; Wu Z; Zhu KS; Zhang JS; Shan H
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1015):945-51. PubMed ID: 22745204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective ECG triggering versus low-dose retrospective ECG-gated 128-channel CT coronary angiography: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Feng Q; Yin Y; Hua X; Zhu R; Hua J; Xu J
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Oct; 65(10):809-14. PubMed ID: 20797467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose.
    Hirai N; Horiguchi J; Fujioka C; Kiguchi M; Yamamoto H; Matsuura N; Kitagawa T; Teragawa H; Kohno N; Ito K
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):424-30. PubMed ID: 18574140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Step-and-shoot prospectively ECG-gated versus retrospectively ECG-gated with tube current modulation coronary CT angiography using the 128-slice MDCT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Jeong DW; Choo KS; Baik SK; Kim YW; Jeon UB; Kim JS; Lim SJ
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar; 52(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 21498343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coronary CT angiography with single-source and dual-source CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose between prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated protocols.
    Sabarudin A; Sun Z; Yusof AK
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):746-53. PubMed ID: 23098849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Post-CABG coronary CT angiography: radiation dose and graft image quality in retrospective versus prospective ECG gating.
    Chazen JL; Prince MR; Yip R; Min JK; Weinsaft JW; Henschke CI; Cham MD
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1122-7. PubMed ID: 20542451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for dual source CT of the coronary stent: comparison of image quality, accuracy, and radiation dose.
    Zhao L; Zhang Z; Fan Z; Yang L; Du J
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 19783395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose.
    Earls JP; Berman EL; Urban BA; Curry CA; Lane JL; Jennings RS; McCulloch CC; Hsieh J; Londt JH
    Radiology; 2008 Mar; 246(3):742-53. PubMed ID: 18195386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Whole-chest 64-MDCT of emergency department patients with nonspecific chest pain: Radiation dose and coronary artery image quality with prospective ECG triggering versus retrospective ECG gating.
    Shuman WP; Branch KR; May JM; Mitsumori LM; Strote JN; Warren BH; Dubinsky TJ; Lockhart DW; Caldwell JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1662-7. PubMed ID: 19457832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective and retrospective ECG-gating for CT coronary angiography perform similarly accurate at low heart rates.
    Stolzmann P; Goetti R; Baumueller S; Plass A; Falk V; Scheffel H; Feuchtner G; Marincek B; Alkadhi H; Leschka S
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jul; 79(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 20079993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective electrocardiogram-gated axial 64-detector computed tomographic angiography vs retrospective gated helical technique to assess coronary artery bypass graft anastomosis: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.
    Machida H; Masukawa A; Tanaka I; Fukui R; Suzuki K; Ueno E; Kodera K; Nakano K; Shen Y
    Circ J; 2010 Apr; 74(4):735-40. PubMed ID: 20154407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of sequential and helical scanning for radiation dose and image quality: results of the Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiation Dose Estimates of Cardiac CT Angiography (PROTECTION) I Study.
    Bischoff B; Hein F; Meyer T; Krebs M; Hadamitzky M; Martinoff S; Schömig A; Hausleiter J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1495-9. PubMed ID: 20489088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of sub-mSv prospective ECG-triggering cardiac CT in young infant with complex congenital heart disease.
    Gao W; Zhong YM; Sun AM; Wang Q; Ouyang RZ; Hu LW; Qiu HS; Wang SY; Li JY
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 32(6):991-8. PubMed ID: 26897005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low-dose adaptive sequential scan for dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with high heart rate: comparison with retrospective ECG gating.
    Xu L; Yang L; Zhang Z; Li Y; Fan Z; Ma X; Lv B; Yu W
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Nov; 76(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 19595528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between prospectively ECG-triggered and retrospectively ECG-gated CT angiography: Establishing heart rate cut-off values in first-generation dual-source CT.
    Ünal E; Yıldız AE; Güler E; Karcaaltıncaba M; Akata D; Kılınçer A; Atlı E; Topçuoğlu M; Hazırolan T
    Anatol J Cardiol; 2015 Sep; 15(9):759-64. PubMed ID: 25592108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual-source versus 64-section CT coronary angiography at lower heart rates: comparison of accuracy and radiation dose.
    Baumüller S; Leschka S; Desbiolles L; Stolzmann P; Scheffel H; Seifert B; Marincek B; Alkadhi H
    Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 19587311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduction of the estimated radiation dose and associated patient risk with prospective ECG-gated 256-slice CT coronary angiography.
    Efstathopoulos EP; Kelekis NL; Pantos I; Brountzos E; Argentos S; Grebác J; Ziaka D; Katritsis DG; Seimenis I
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(17):5209-22. PubMed ID: 19671974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image quality and radiation exposure using different low-dose scan protocols in dual-source CT coronary angiography: randomized study.
    Neefjes LA; Dharampal AS; Rossi A; Nieman K; Weustink AC; Dijkshoorn ML; Ten Kate GJ; Dedic A; Papadopoulou SL; van Straten M; Cademartiri F; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ; Mollet NR
    Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):779-86. PubMed ID: 21969666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.