These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18552609)
1. Corneal biomechanical properties in primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma. Ang GS; Bochmann F; Townend J; Azuara-Blanco A J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 18552609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma. Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma and comparison with open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes. Grise-Dulac A; Saad A; Abitbol O; Febbraro JL; Azan E; Moulin-Tyrode C; Gatinel D J Glaucoma; 2012 Sep; 21(7):486-9. PubMed ID: 21734593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer. Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Pourjavan S Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of ocular response analyzer parameters in chinese subjects with primary angle-closure and primary open-angle glaucoma. Narayanaswamy A; Su DH; Baskaran M; Tan AC; Nongpiur ME; Htoon HM; Wong TY; Aung T Arch Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr; 129(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 21482869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ocular response analyser to assess hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in low tension, open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Shah S; Laiquzzaman M; Mantry S; Cunliffe I Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Aug; 36(6):508-13. PubMed ID: 18954311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes. Tejwani S; Devi S; Dinakaran S; Shetty R; Meshram P; Francis M; Sinha Roy A Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 57(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 26968738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of corneal biomechanical properties on rebound tonometer in patients with normal-tension glaucoma. Shin J; Lee JW; Kim EA; Caprioli J Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 159(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 25308786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Corneal biomechanical responses detected using corvis st in primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma. Jung Y; Park HL; Oh S; Park CK Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Feb; 99(7):e19126. PubMed ID: 32049829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of ocular response analyzer parameters in primary open angle glaucoma and exfoliative glaucoma patients. Beyazyıldız E; Beyazyıldız O; Arifoğlu HB; Altıntaş AK; Köklü SG Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 62(7):782-7. PubMed ID: 25116770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open-angle glaucoma. Hirneiss C; Neubauer AS; Yu A; Kampik A; Kernt M Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 89(2):e189-92. PubMed ID: 21288308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the corneal biomechanical properties with the Ocular Response Analyzer® (ORA) in African and Caucasian normal subjects and patients with glaucoma. Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Hautenauven F; Pourjavan S Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):e118-24. PubMed ID: 21989354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance of assessing corneal biomechanical properties in glaucoma patients care - a review. Dascalescu D; Corbu C; Vasile P; Iancu R; Cristea M; Ionescu C; Radu Constantin C; Voinea L Rom J Ophthalmol; 2016; 60(4):219-225. PubMed ID: 29450353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]