BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18552677)

  • 1. Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging features of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Lurie JD; Tosteson AN; Tosteson TD; Carragee E; Carrino JA; Kaiser J; Sequeiros RT; Lecomte AR; Grove MR; Blood EA; Pearson LH; Weinstein JN; Herzog R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(14):1605-10. PubMed ID: 18552677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging readings for lumbar disc herniation in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).
    Lurie JD; Tosteson AN; Tosteson TD; Carragee E; Carrino JA; Kaiser J; Sequeiros RT; Lecomte AR; Grove MR; Blood EA; Pearson LH; Herzog R; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(9):991-8. PubMed ID: 18427321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verification of measurements of lumbar spinal dimensions in T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences.
    Cheung JP; Shigematsu H; Cheung KM
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1476-83. PubMed ID: 24314906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis: intra- and inter-reader agreement for magnetic resonance imaging parameters.
    Winklhofer S; Held U; Burgstaller JM; Finkenstaedt T; Bolog N; Ulrich N; Steurer J; Andreisek G; Del Grande F
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):353-361. PubMed ID: 27334492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Qualitative versus quantitative lumbar spinal stenosis grading by machine learning supported texture analysis-Experience from the LSOS study cohort.
    Huber FA; Stutz S; Vittoria de Martini I; Mannil M; Becker AS; Winklhofer S; Burgstaller JM; Guggenberger R
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():45-50. PubMed ID: 31005175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual and quantitative assessment of lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Sipola P; Leinonen V; Niemeläinen R; Aalto T; Vanninen R; Manninen H; Airaksinen O; Battié MC
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Nov; 52(9):1024-31. PubMed ID: 21969705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.
    Singh K; Samartzis D; Vaccaro AR; Nassr A; Andersson GB; Yoon ST; Phillips FM; Goldberg EJ; An HS
    Spine J; 2005; 5(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 16291100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interrater and intrarater agreements of magnetic resonance imaging findings in the lumbar spine: significant variability across degenerative conditions.
    Fu MC; Buerba RA; Long WD; Blizzard DJ; Lischuk AW; Haims AH; Grauer JN
    Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2442-8. PubMed ID: 24642053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved accuracy of diagnosis of lumbar intra and/or extra-foraminal stenosis by use of three-dimensional MR imaging: comparison with conventional MR imaging.
    Yamada H; Terada M; Iwasaki H; Endo T; Okada M; Nakao S; Hashizume H; Minamide A; Nakagawa Y; Nishi H; Tsutsui S; Oka H; Yoshida M
    J Orthop Sci; 2015 Mar; 20(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 25491380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new comprehensive MRI classification and grading system for lumbosacral central and lateral stenosis: clinical application and comparison with previous systems.
    Spinnato P; Petrera MR; Parmeggiani A; Manzetti M; Ruffilli A; Faldini C; D'Agostino V; Di Carlo M; Cumani MP; Crombé A; Matcuk GR; Miceli M
    Radiol Med; 2024 Jan; 129(1):93-106. PubMed ID: 37882917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Observer variability in assessing lumbar spinal stenosis severity on magnetic resonance imaging and its relation to cross-sectional spinal canal area.
    Speciale AC; Pietrobon R; Urban CW; Richardson WJ; Helms CA; Major N; Enterline D; Hey L; Haglund M; Turner DA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 May; 27(10):1082-6. PubMed ID: 12004176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of standing weight-bearing (0.25T) MR imaging findings and positional changes in the lumbar spine.
    Hansen BB; Hansen P; Christensen AF; Trampedach C; Rasti Z; Bliddal H; Boesen M
    Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Jan; 47(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 28812185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis.
    Lee S; Lee JW; Yeom JS; Kim KJ; Kim HJ; Chung SK; Kang HS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):1095-8. PubMed ID: 20308517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for assessing central lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Park HJ; Kim SS; Lee YJ; Lee SY; Park NH; Choi YJ; Chung EC; Rho MH
    Br J Radiol; 2013 May; 86(1025):20120180. PubMed ID: 23426848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiographic assessment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: is MRI superior to CT?
    Alsaleh K; Ho D; Rosas-Arellano MP; Stewart TC; Gurr KR; Bailey CS
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):362-367. PubMed ID: 27663702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical correlation of a new MR imaging method for assessing lumbar foraminal stenosis.
    Park HJ; Kim SS; Lee SY; Park NH; Rho MH; Hong HP; Kwag HJ; Kook SH; Choi SH
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2012 May; 33(5):818-22. PubMed ID: 22241383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early postoperative MRI.
    Schenck C; van Susante J; van Gorp M; Belder R; Vleggeert-Lankamp C
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 May; 158(5):981-8. PubMed ID: 27005673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of preoperative MRI findings in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Banitalebi H; Espeland A; Anvar M; Hermansen E; Hellum C; Brox JI; Myklebust TÅ; Indrekvam K; Brisby H; Weber C; Aaen J; Austevoll IM; Grundnes O; Negård A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jan; 23(1):51. PubMed ID: 35033042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is multidetector computed tomography comparable to magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of lumbar foraminal stenosis?
    Kang WY; Ahn JM; Lee JW; Lee E; Bae YJ; Seo J; Kim J; Kang HS
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 27055917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A practical MRI grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.
    Park HJ; Kim SS; Lee SY; Park NH; Chung EC; Rho MH; Kwon HJ; Kook SH
    Br J Radiol; 2013 May; 86(1025):20120515. PubMed ID: 23410800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.