These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18553365)
1. Critical assessment of tools to predict clinically insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy in contemporary men. Chun FK; Haese A; Ahyai SA; Walz J; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Graefen M; Erbersdobler A; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(4):701-9. PubMed ID: 18553365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of pathological prostate cancer characteristics in men with favorable biopsy features on predominantly sextant biopsy. Chun FK; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Jeldres C; Ahyai S; Graefen M; Haese A; Steuber T; Erbersdobler A; Montorsi F; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI Eur Urol; 2009 Mar; 55(3):617-28-6. PubMed ID: 18499335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A nomogram for predicting low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer: a tool in selecting patients for active surveillance. Nakanishi H; Wang X; Ochiai A; Trpkov K; Yilmaz A; Donnelly JB; Davis JW; Troncoso P; Babaian RJ Cancer; 2007 Dec; 110(11):2441-7. PubMed ID: 17932909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relationship between tumor volume and the number of positive cores in men undergoing multisite extended biopsy: implication for expectant management. Ochiai A; Troncoso P; Chen ME; Lloreta J; Babaian RJ J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2164-8, discussion 2168. PubMed ID: 16280756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion based on the extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Briganti A; Chun FK; Salonia A; Gallina A; Farina E; Da Pozzo LF; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI BJU Int; 2006 Oct; 98(4):788-93. PubMed ID: 16796698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and split-sample validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of seminal vesicle invasion at radical prostatectomy. Gallina A; Chun FK; Briganti A; Shariat SF; Montorsi F; Salonia A; Erbersdobler A; Rigatti P; Valiquette L; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 17267098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a nomogram for prediction of side specific extracapsular extension at radical prostatectomy. Steuber T; Graefen M; Haese A; Erbersdobler A; Chun FK; Schlom T; Perrotte P; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI J Urol; 2006 Mar; 175(3 Pt 1):939-44; discussion 944. PubMed ID: 16469587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Percentage of positive biopsy cores can improve the ability to predict lymph node invasion in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Chun FK; Gallina A; Salonia A; Zanni G; Valiquette L; Graefen M; Huland H; Rigatti P; Montorsi F Eur Urol; 2007 Jun; 51(6):1573-81. PubMed ID: 17293026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. Chun FK; Steuber T; Erbersdobler A; Currlin E; Walz J; Schlomm T; Haese A; Heinzer H; McCormack M; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI Eur Urol; 2006 May; 49(5):820-6. PubMed ID: 16439050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate-specific antigen improves the ability of clinical stage and biopsy Gleason sum to predict the pathologic stage at radical prostatectomy in the new millennium. Chun FK; Briganti A; Gallina A; Hutterer GC; Shariat SF; Antebie E; Walz J; Roehrborn CG; Salonia A; Rigatti P; Saad F; Huland H; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1067-74. PubMed ID: 17383807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. Briganti A; Larcher A; Abdollah F; Capitanio U; Gallina A; Suardi N; Bianchi M; Sun M; Freschi M; Salonia A; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 22078338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combined prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy features to predict "clinically insignificant" prostate cancer. Loeb S; Roehl KA; Thaxton CS; Catalona WJ Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 18436287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significant upgrading affects a third of men diagnosed with prostate cancer: predictive nomogram and internal validation. Chun FK; Briganti A; Shariat SF; Graefen M; Montorsi F; Erbersdobler A; Steuber T; Salonia A; Currlin E; Scattoni V; Friedrich MG; Schlomm T; Haese A; Michl U; Colombo R; Heinzer H; Valiquette L; Rigatti P; Roehrborn CG; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI BJU Int; 2006 Aug; 98(2):329-34. PubMed ID: 16879673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer. Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T; J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting the presence and side of extracapsular extension: a nomogram for staging prostate cancer. Ohori M; Kattan MW; Koh H; Maru N; Slawin KM; Shariat S; Muramoto M; Reuter VE; Wheeler TM; Scardino PT J Urol; 2004 May; 171(5):1844-9; discussion 1849. PubMed ID: 15076291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a prediction model for low volume/low grade cancer: application in selecting patients for active surveillance. Ochiai A; Trpkov K; Yilmaz A; Donnelly B; Babaian RJ J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):907-10. PubMed ID: 17296373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relating biopsy and clinical variables to radical prostatectomy findings: can insignificant and advanced prostate cancer be predicted in a screening population? Anast JW; Andriole GL; Bismar TA; Yan Y; Humphrey PA Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 15351590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. Briganti A; Chun FK; Salonia A; Zanni G; Scattoni V; Valiquette L; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI Eur Urol; 2006 Jun; 49(6):1019-26; discussion 1026-7. PubMed ID: 16530933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Valiquette L; Perrotte P; Jeldres C; Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Salonia A; Montorsi F Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1087-91. PubMed ID: 19195695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]