These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18554270)

  • 1. Epistemic uncertainty in the ranking and categorization of probabilistic safety assessment model elements: issues and findings.
    Borgonovo E
    Risk Anal; 2008 Aug; 28(4):983-1001. PubMed ID: 18554270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertainty analysis based on probability bounds (p-box) approach in probabilistic safety assessment.
    Karanki DR; Kushwaha HS; Verma AK; Ajit S
    Risk Anal; 2009 May; 29(5):662-75. PubMed ID: 19302279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A combined Monte Carlo and possibilistic approach to uncertainty propagation in event tree analysis.
    Baraldi P; Zio E
    Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1309-26. PubMed ID: 18631304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extension of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for long term dose assessment of high level nuclear waste disposal sites to uncertainties in the human behaviour.
    Albrecht A; Miquel S
    J Environ Radioact; 2010 Jan; 101(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 19758732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the need for restricting the probabilistic analysis in risk assessments to variability.
    Aven T
    Risk Anal; 2010 Mar; 30(3):354-60; author reply 381-4. PubMed ID: 19919552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring uncertainty importance: investigation and comparison of alternative approaches.
    Borgonovo E
    Risk Anal; 2006 Oct; 26(5):1349-61. PubMed ID: 17054536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hypothesis testing, statistical power, and confidence limits in the presence of epistemic uncertainty.
    Hofer E
    Health Phys; 2007 Mar; 92(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 17293694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probability and possibility-based representations of uncertainty in fault tree analysis.
    Flage R; Baraldi P; Zio E; Aven T
    Risk Anal; 2013 Jan; 33(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 22831561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model-based environmental assessment: the NUSAP system.
    van der Sluijs JP; Craye M; Funtowicz S; Kloprogge P; Ravetz J; Risbey J
    Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):481-92. PubMed ID: 15876219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
    Flores-Alsina X; Rodríguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methods for assessing uncertainty in fundamental assumptions and associated models for cancer risk assessment.
    Small MJ
    Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1289-308. PubMed ID: 18844862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the ranking probabilities for partial orders based on random linear extensions.
    Lerche D; Sørensen PB
    Chemosphere; 2003 Dec; 53(8):981-92. PubMed ID: 14505721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Failure probability under parameter uncertainty.
    Gerrard R; Tsanakas A
    Risk Anal; 2011 May; 31(5):727-44. PubMed ID: 21175720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of numerical solutions of partial differential equations with probabilistic and possibilistic parameters for the quantification of uncertainty in subsurface solute transport.
    Zhang K; Achari G; Li H
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Nov; 110(1-2):45-59. PubMed ID: 19796843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the use of hierarchical probabilistic models for characterizing and managing uncertainty in risk/safety assessment.
    Kodell RL; Chen JJ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):433-7. PubMed ID: 17511709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Handling uncertainty of the economic evaluation result: sensitivity analysis.
    Limwattananon S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S59-65. PubMed ID: 19253488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element-based probabilistic analysis tool for orthopaedic applications.
    Easley SK; Pal S; Tomaszewski PR; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ; Laz PJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Jan; 85(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 17084937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling the imprecision in prospective dosimetry of internal exposure to uranium.
    Davesne E; Chojnacki E; Paquet F; Blanchardon E
    Health Phys; 2009 Feb; 96(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 19131736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experiences with the NUSAP system for multidimensional uncertainty assessment.
    van der Sluijs J; Craye M; Funtowicz S; Kloprogge P; Ravetz J; Risbey J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):133-44. PubMed ID: 16304945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A two-stage inexact joint-probabilistic programming method for air quality management under uncertainty.
    Lv Y; Huang GH; Li YP; Yang ZF; Sun W
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Mar; 92(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 21067860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.