These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18554270)

  • 41. Is probability the only coherent approach to uncertainty?
    Colyvan M
    Risk Anal; 2008 Jun; 28(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 18643822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Structural-acoustic modeling of automotive vehicles in presence of uncertainties and experimental identification and validation.
    Durand JF; Soize C; Gagliardini L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1513-25. PubMed ID: 19045643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Addressing uncertainties in the ERICA Integrated Approach.
    Oughton DH; Agüero A; Avila R; Brown JE; Copplestone D; Gilek M
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1384-92. PubMed ID: 18508164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Sensitivity analysis of model output with input constraints: a generalized rationale for local methods.
    Borgonovo E
    Risk Anal; 2008 Jun; 28(3):667-80. PubMed ID: 18643824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An integrated methodology for recording uncertainties about environmental data.
    Brown JD; Heuvelink GB; Refsgaard JC
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):153-60. PubMed ID: 16304947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Estimating conditional probabilities of terrorist attacks: modeling adversaries with uncertain value tradeoffs.
    Levine ES
    Risk Anal; 2012 Feb; 32(2):294-303. PubMed ID: 21801187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Impact of input data uncertainties on urban stormwater model parameters.
    Kleidorfer M; Deletic A; Fletcher TD; Rauch W
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(6):1545-54. PubMed ID: 19759457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of measurement uncertainty of glucose in clinical chemistry.
    Berçik Inal B; Koldas M; Inal H; Coskun C; Gümüs A; Döventas Y
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Apr; 1100():223-6. PubMed ID: 17460183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An information theory approach to minimise correlated systematic uncertainty in modelling resonance parameters.
    Kumar PT; Sekimoto H
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Feb; 67(2):329-33. PubMed ID: 19019694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Resources and uncertainties in evaluation of chemicals: basic methodological developments.
    Sørensen PB; Lerche DB; Brüggemann R
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):235-42. PubMed ID: 16304955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Use of sensitivity analysis to aid interpretation of a probabilistic Bacillus cereus spore lag time model applied to heat-treated chilled foods (REPFEDs).
    Membré JM; Kan-King-Yu D; Blackburn Cde W
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 128(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 18691785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Regulatory models and the environment: practice, pitfalls, and prospects.
    Holmes KJ; Graham JA; McKone T; Whipple C
    Risk Anal; 2009 Feb; 29(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 19144069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quantitative assessment of building fire risk to life safety.
    Guanquan C; Jinhua S
    Risk Anal; 2008 Jun; 28(3):615-25. PubMed ID: 18643819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of a decision analytic model for posteradication polio risk management.
    Duintjer Tebbens RJ; Pallansch MA; Kew OM; Sutter RW; Bruce Aylward R; Watkins M; Gary H; Alexander J; Jafari H; Cochi SL; Thompson KM
    Risk Anal; 2008 Aug; 28(4):855-76. PubMed ID: 18627544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Optimal foraging: the importance of environmental stochasticity and accuracy in parameter estimation.
    Yoccoz NG; Engen S; Stenseth NC
    Am Nat; 1993 Jan; 141(1):139-57. PubMed ID: 19426024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluating critical uncertainty thresholds in a spatial model of forest pest invasion risk.
    Koch FH; Yemshanov D; McKenney DW; Smith WD
    Risk Anal; 2009 Sep; 29(9):1227-41. PubMed ID: 19558391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An objective test of stochastic behavior in riverine water quality models.
    Parker GT; Droste RL; Rennie CD
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 19151498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A suggestion for the quantification of precise and bounded probability to quantify epistemic uncertainty in scientific assessments.
    Raices Cruz I; Troffaes MCM; Sahlin U
    Risk Anal; 2022 Feb; 42(2):239-253. PubMed ID: 35007348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Using semivariogram parameter uncertainty in hydrogeological applications.
    Pardo-Igúzquiza E; Chica-Olmo M; Garcia-Soldado MJ; Luque-Espinar JA
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 18793202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Calibrating and validating bacterial water quality models: a Bayesian approach.
    Gronewold AD; Qian SS; Wolpert RL; Reckhow KH
    Water Res; 2009 Jun; 43(10):2688-98. PubMed ID: 19395060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.