303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18555037)
1. The role of specialist neuroradiology second opinion reporting: is there added value?
Briggs GM; Flynn PA; Worthington M; Rennie I; McKinstry CS
Clin Radiol; 2008 Jul; 63(7):791-5. PubMed ID: 18555037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality assurance of neuroradiology in a District General Hospital.
McCarron MO; Sands C; McCarron P
QJM; 2006 Mar; 99(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 16469764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re: The role of specialist neuroradiology second opinion reporting: is there added value?
FitzGerald R
Clin Radiol; 2009 Feb; 64(2):220-1; author reply 221-2. PubMed ID: 19103355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Discrepancy in reporting among specialist registrars and the role of a paediatric neuroradiologist in reporting paediatric CT head examinations.
Nagaraja S; Ullah Q; Lee KJ; Bickle I; Hon LQ; Griffiths PD; Raghavan A; Flynn P; Connolly DJ
Clin Radiol; 2009 Sep; 64(9):891-6. PubMed ID: 19664479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Second-opinion consultations in neuroradiology.
Zan E; Yousem DM; Carone M; Lewin JS
Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 20308451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies.
Cooper VF; Goodhartz LA; Nemcek AA; Ryu RK
Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1198-204. PubMed ID: 18692761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level 1 trauma center.
Carney E; Kempf J; DeCarvalho V; Yudd A; Nosher J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 12876012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Picture archiving and communication systems lead to sustained improvements in reporting times and productivity: results of a 5-year audit.
Mackinnon AD; Billington RA; Adam EJ; Dundas DD; Patel U
Clin Radiol; 2008 Jul; 63(7):796-804. PubMed ID: 18555038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality outcomes of reinterpretation of brain CT studies by subspecialty experts in stroke imaging.
Jordan YJ; Jordan JE; Lightfoote JB; Ragland KD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1365-70. PubMed ID: 23169731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eight CT lessons that we learned the hard way: an analysis of current patterns of radiological error and discrepancy with particular emphasis on CT.
McCreadie G; Oliver TB
Clin Radiol; 2009 May; 64(5):491-9; discussion 500-1. PubMed ID: 19348844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors affecting attending agreement with resident early readings of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the head, neck, and spine.
Sistrom C; Deitte L
Acad Radiol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):934-41. PubMed ID: 18572131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patterns of misinterpretation of adnexal masses on CT and MR in an academic radiology department.
Asch E; Levine D; Pedrosa I; Hecht JL; Kruskal J
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):969-80. PubMed ID: 19380241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neuroimaging reports in a general hospital: results from a quality-improvement program.
McCarron MO; Sands C; McCarron P
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2010 Jan; 112(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 19910106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital.
Ruchman RB; Jaeger J; Wiggins EF; Seinfeld S; Thakral V; Bolla S; Wallach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 17715095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. JOURNAL CLUB: Hepatopancreaticobiliary Imaging Second-Opinion Consultations: Is There Value in the Second Reading?
Shetty AS; Mittal A; Salter A; Narra VR; Fowler KJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):1264-1272. PubMed ID: 30247982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The disproportionate effects of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 on radiologists' private office MRI and CT practices compared with those of other physicians.
Levin DC; Rao VM; Parker L; Frangos AJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Sep; 6(9):620-5. PubMed ID: 19720356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Second opinion interpretations by specialty radiologists at a pediatric hospital: rate of disagreement and clinical implications.
Eakins C; Ellis WD; Pruthi S; Johnson DP; Hernanz-Schulman M; Yu C; Kan JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Oct; 199(4):916-20. PubMed ID: 22997387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiologists' clinical practice of neuroimaging.
Sunshine JH; Merewitz L; Lewis RS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Aug; 5(8):907-918.e8. PubMed ID: 18657787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discrepancy rates of radiology resident interpretations of on-call neuroradiology MR imaging studies.
Filippi CG; Schneider B; Burbank HN; Alsofrom GF; Linnell G; Ratkovits B
Radiology; 2008 Dec; 249(3):972-9. PubMed ID: 19011191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
