These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1855511)

  • 1. Assessment of radiology installations in Macedonia, Greece.
    Okkalides D
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 12(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 1855511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dose and quality control (DQC) in diagnostic radiology.
    Holloway AF; Taylor KW; Hobbs BB
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Jun; 35(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 6480667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of NCRP Report No. 49 assumptions on workloads and use factors in diagnostic radiology facilities.
    Simpkin DJ
    Med Phys; 1996 Apr; 23(4):577-84. PubMed ID: 8860905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic film processors' quality control test in Greek military hospitals.
    Lymberis C; Efstathopoulos EP; Manetou A; Poudridis G
    Eur J Radiol; 1993 Apr; 16(3):246-9. PubMed ID: 8508847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Selected technical aspects of roentgen diagnostic equipment from the view of quality control requirements].
    Demczuk P; Jankowski J
    Med Pr; 1997; 48(3):293-305. PubMed ID: 9312656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-assisted quality assurance for radiographic equipment.
    Glaze S; Schneiders N; Archer B; Bushong S
    Med Phys; 1980; 7(4):386-8. PubMed ID: 7393167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. X-ray machine calibration: a study of failure rates.
    Pirtle OL
    Radiol Technol; 1994; 65(5):291-5; quiz 296-8. PubMed ID: 8058911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance evaluation of diagnostic radiology dosimeters in clinical and calibration x-ray beams.
    Hourdakis CJ; Boziari A; Manetou A
    Health Phys; 2010 May; 98(5):704-16. PubMed ID: 20386200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review of acceptability criteria for X ray systems relevant for digital radiology.
    Zoetelief J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 11487844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic X-ray facilities as per quality control performances in Tanzania.
    Sungita YY
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 7(4):66-73. PubMed ID: 17533355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practical application of suspension criteria scenarios in general radiography, computed radiography,digital radiography and fluoroscopy.
    O'Connor U; Gallagher A; O'Reilly G; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 23169811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of medical radiographic X-ray systems in Greece for the time period 1998-2004.
    Economides S; Hourdakis CJ; Kalivas N; Kalathaki M; Simantirakis G; Tritakis P; Manousaridis G; Vogiatzi S; Kipouros P; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V
    Phys Med; 2007 Dec; 23(3-4):107-14. PubMed ID: 18023226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinically acceptable tolerance of roentgen generator exposure parameters.
    Forsberg H
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 2952133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Experiences in the testing of standard data on roentgen diagnostic equipment].
    Klimpel H
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Apr; 38(4):105-8. PubMed ID: 4001772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality control and diagnostic reference levels in intraoral dental radiographic facilities.
    Hatziioannou K; Psarouli E; Papanastassiou E; Bousbouras P; Kodona H; Kimoundri O; Delichas M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Sep; 34(5):304-7. PubMed ID: 16120881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functionality and operation of fluoroscopic automatic brightness control/automatic dose rate control logic in modern cardiovascular and interventional angiography systems: a report of Task Group 125 Radiography/Fluoroscopy Subcommittee, Imaging Physics Committee, Science Council.
    Rauch P; Lin PJ; Balter S; Fukuda A; Goode A; Hartwell G; LaFrance T; Nickoloff E; Shepard J; Strauss K
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2826-8. PubMed ID: 22559654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nationwide surveys of chest, abdomen, lumbosacral spine radiography, and upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy: a summary of findings.
    Spelic DC; Kaczmarek RV; Hilohi MC; Moyal AE
    Health Phys; 2010 Mar; 98(3):498-514. PubMed ID: 20147791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Quality control in x-ray diagnosis by using a universally applicable phantom].
    Eder H
    Rofo; 1983 Nov; 139(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 6416970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aberrations in X-ray output waveforms of radiological generators.
    Okkalides D; Arvanitides D
    Eur J Radiol; 1992 Oct; 15(3):248-51. PubMed ID: 1490452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, part I].
    Krug B; Böttge M; Coburger S; Reineke T; Zähringer M; V Smekal U; Winnekendonk G; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 12525980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.