484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18555489)
1. Re: Ghost writers in the sky.
Michel MC
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):788; discussion 788. PubMed ID: 18555489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ghost writers in the sky.
J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):809-10. PubMed ID: 18221969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ghost writers in the sky.
Chabner BA
Oncologist; 2009 Mar; 14(3):199-200. PubMed ID: 19286763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Publication ethics and the ghost management of medical publication.
Sismondo S; Doucet M
Bioethics; 2010 Jul; 24(6):273-83. PubMed ID: 19222451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The involvement of professional medical writers in medical publications.
Daskalopoulou SS; Mikhailidis DP
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Feb; 21(2):307-10. PubMed ID: 15802002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Publication ethics policies for medical journals.
Pai SA
Indian J Med Ethics; 2004; 1(3):93. PubMed ID: 16370089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical contributions to research articles by medical writers.
Shashok K
Anesth Analg; 2013 Feb; 116(2):500-3. PubMed ID: 23340749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Writing for publication: avoiding common ethical pitfalls.
Siedlecki SL; Montague M; Schultz J
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 18344788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Haunted manuscripts: ghost authorship in the medical literature.
Ngai S; Gold JL; Gill SS; Rochon PA
Account Res; 2005; 12(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 16220624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Writing and publishing health sciences research: ethical considerations and experiences from EAMJ.
Lore W
East Afr Med J; 1999 Dec; 76(12):659-60. PubMed ID: 10734532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ghost-authors, improvement article communication, and medical publications.
Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
Neurologia; 2011 Jun; 26(5):257-61. PubMed ID: 21356568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comments on European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications.
Foote M; Hamilton CW; Mallia-Hughes M
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 May; 21(5):703-4; author reply 704. PubMed ID: 15969869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Reporting of scientific misconduct in health care research].
Klasen EC; Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Aug; 146(35):1622-4. PubMed ID: 12233155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transparency and trust: in defence of medical writers.
Jacobs A
BMJ; 2004 Dec; 329(7478):1345. PubMed ID: 15576758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications.
Jacobs A; Wager E
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Feb; 21(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 15802003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The ethical assignment of authorship in scientific publications: issues and guidelines.
Feeser VR; Simon JR
Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Oct; 15(10):963-9. PubMed ID: 18801021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The 'truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth...'.
Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(6):281-2. PubMed ID: 19041445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Not being clear about authorship is lying and damages the scientific record.
England C; Hodgkinson M; Tamber PS
Natl Med J India; 2007; 20(2):56-8. PubMed ID: 17802982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials.
Gøtzsche PC; Hróbjartsson A; Johansen HK; Haahr MT; Altman DG; Chan AW
PLoS Med; 2007 Jan; 4(1):e19. PubMed ID: 17227134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Who wrote this paper? Basics of authorship and ethical issues.
Marco CA; Schmidt TA
Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Jan; 11(1):76-7. PubMed ID: 14709433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]