These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 185555)

  • 1. Noise citation penalty: the tip of the iceberg.
    Ehlke DB
    Occup Health Saf; 1976; 45(5):22-7. PubMed ID: 185555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Review Commission: vital buffer in noise actions.
    Barnako FR
    Occup Health Saf; 1976; 45(4):18-21. PubMed ID: 181705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noise is a prime target at OSHA.
    Corn M
    Occup Health Saf; 1976; 45(4):12-7. PubMed ID: 181704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Start early to engineer against noise.
    Sedgeley WA
    Occup Health Saf; 1976; 45(4):52-5. PubMed ID: 181712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Take a scientific look at the noise hazard.
    Ward WD
    Occup Health Saf; 1976; 45(4):32-6. PubMed ID: 181708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protective devices in a hearing conservation program. The rationale and justification of personal hearing protectors.
    Gosztonyi RE
    J Occup Med; 1975 Nov; 17(11):731-3. PubMed ID: 1195035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Needed: a balanced approach to hearing protection.
    Strassburg RW
    Occup Health Saf; 1976; 45(4):42-3, 45-7. PubMed ID: 181710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpreting noise dosimeter results based on different noise standards.
    Brief RS; Confer RG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1975 Sep; 36(9):677-82. PubMed ID: 1180219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abrasive blasting protective practices study--field survey results.
    Blair AW
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1975 Oct; 36(10):745-51. PubMed ID: 1180207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Focus on cutting noise.
    Hildyard VH
    Occup Health Saf; 1976; 45(4):26, 28,30-1. PubMed ID: 181707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A talk with the peripatetic John Stender.
    Stender J
    Int J Occup Health Saf; 1975; 44(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 1126792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Editorial: The noise problem at OSHA.
    DiBiasio AG
    Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon; 1975 Mar; 54(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 1116583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do noise studies tackle phoney issues?
    Samuels S
    Occup Health Saf; 1976; 45(4):22-4. PubMed ID: 181706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determine job hazards, then invest in protection.
    Newport RT
    Int J Occup Health Saf; 1975; 44(5):38, 65. PubMed ID: 1181300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal and administrative aspects of personnel dosimetry.
    Hart JC
    Health Phys; 1972 Sep; 23(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 4264651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The quality of the work environment.
    Brown ML
    Am J Nurs; 1975 Oct; 75(10):1755-60, 1793-4. PubMed ID: 1041550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preventing hearing loss due to excessive noise exposure.
    Sataloff J
    J Occup Med; 1974 Jul; 16(7):470-1. PubMed ID: 4842003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Hearing Conservation Amendment (Part I).
    Berger EH
    Occup Health Nurs; 1983 Nov; 31(11):15-7. PubMed ID: 6557429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Where is the point of no hearing damage?
    Van Atta FA
    Occup Health Saf; 1976; 45(4):38-41. PubMed ID: 181709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testimony of the American Industrial Hygiene Association. OSHA proposed rule on air contaminants.
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1988 Nov; 49(11):A720-724. PubMed ID: 3195470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.