81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18555545)
1. Use of skin markers and electronic portal imaging to improve verification of tangential breast irradiation.
Salm Av; Strijbos J; Dijcks C; Murrer L; Borger J; Boersma L
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jan; 90(1):106-9. PubMed ID: 18555545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electronic portal images (EPIs) based position verification for the breast simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique.
Sijtsema NM; van Dijk-Peters FB; Langendijk JA; Maduro JH; van 't Veld AA
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 22098795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A technique for verification of isocenter position in tangential field breast irradiation.
Prabhakar R; Pande M; Harsh K; Julka PK; Ganesh T; Rath GK
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 19181250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter- and intra-fraction geometric errors in daily image-guided radiotherapy of free-breathing breast cancer patients measured with continuous portal imaging.
Thomsen MS; Harrov U; Fledelius W; Poulsen PR
Acta Oncol; 2014 Jun; 53(6):802-8. PubMed ID: 24739061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a laser system for CT software simulation (EXOMIO) in patients with breast cancer.
Strassmann G; Vacha P; Osterhaus T; Battmann A; Richter D; Nashwan K; Neidel HO; Klose KJ; Engenhart-Cabillic R
Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Sep; 180(9):597-600. PubMed ID: 15378191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of computed tomography in radiotherapy treatment planning for breast cancer. How does conventional radiotherapy planning compare with virtual?
Bauduceau O; Bollet MA; Pons P; Kirova YM; Fayolle M; Zervoudis S; Campana F
J BUON; 2008; 13(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 18555473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A totally integrated simulation technique for three-field breast treatment using a CT simulator.
Butker EK; Helton DJ; Keller JW; Hughes LL; Crenshaw T; Davis LW
Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1809-14. PubMed ID: 8946378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short communication: Setup variations in locoregional radiotherapy for breast cancer: an electronic portal imaging study.
Truong PT; Berthelet E; Patenaude V; Bishop J; Sandwith B; Moravan V; Beckham W; Mitchell T; Olivotto IA
Br J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 78(932):742-5. PubMed ID: 16046427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra- and interfractional reproducibility of tangential breast fields: a prospective on-line portal imaging study.
Fein DA; McGee KP; Schultheiss TE; Fowble BL; Hanks GE
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Feb; 34(3):733-40. PubMed ID: 8621299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electronic portal imaging registration in breast cancer radiotherapy verification: analysis of inter-observer agreement among different categories of health practitioners.
Jereczek-Fossa BA; Santoro L; Colangione SP; Morselli L; Fodor C; Vischioni B; Rozza D; Leppa A; Cambria R; Leonardi MC; Morra A; Baroni G; Zurrida S; Orecchia R
Neoplasma; 2013; 60(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 23374000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Setup Errors at the Skin Surface Position for Whole Breast Radiotherapy of Breast Cancer Patients.
Miyahara K; Kuroda M; Yoshimura Y; Aoyama H; Oita M; Sugianto I; Matsuzaki H; Ihara H; Katayama N; Katsui K; Kanazawa S; Asaumi J
Acta Med Okayama; 2018 Aug; 72(4):331-336. PubMed ID: 30140079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cone beam computed tomography guidance for setup of patients receiving accelerated partial breast irradiation.
White EA; Cho J; Vallis KA; Sharpe MB; Lee G; Blackburn H; Nageeti T; McGibney C; Jaffray DA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jun; 68(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 17418964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of setup accuracy in patients receiving postmastectomy radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging.
Koseoglu FG; Tuncel N; Kizildag AU; Garipagaoglu M; Adli M; Andic C
Radiat Med; 2007 Feb; 25(2):45-52. PubMed ID: 17541512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Virtual simulation of a boost field in adjuvant radiotherapy of the breast.
Kaiser A; Moser L; Kuschke W; Hinkelbein M; Buchali A; Budach V
Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Oct; 180(10):637-41. PubMed ID: 15480512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Forward-planned, multiple-segment, tangential fields with concomitant boost in the treatment of breast cancer.
Mayo C; Lo YC; Fitzgerald TJ; Urie M
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 15528068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of intra- and inter-fraction motion in breast radiotherapy using electronic portal cine imaging.
Kron T; Lee C; Perera F; Yu E
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Oct; 3(5):443-9. PubMed ID: 15453809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Verification and correction of setup deviations in tangential breast irradiation using EPID: gain versus workload.
Pouliot J; Lirette A
Med Phys; 1996 Aug; 23(8):1393-8. PubMed ID: 8873036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter-fraction motion and dosimetric consequences during breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
Jain P; Marchant T; Green M; Watkins G; Davies J; McCarthy C; Loncaster J; Stewart A; Magee B; Moore C; Price P
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jan; 90(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 19012980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo determination of the accuracy of field matching in breast cancer irradiation using an electronic portal imaging device.
Holmberg O; Huizenga H; Idzes MH; Lebesque JV; Vijlbrief RE; Mijnheer BJ
Radiother Oncol; 1994 Nov; 33(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 7708959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces the dose to the contralateral breast when compared to conventional tangential fields for primary breast irradiation.
Bhatnagar AK; Brandner E; Sonnik D; Wu A; Kalnicki S; Deutsch M; Heron DE
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Mar; 96(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16244787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
