These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18555963)

  • 1. Core reporting practices in structural equation modeling.
    Schreiber JB
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2008 Jun; 4(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 18555963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mediational analysis in HIV/AIDS research: estimating multivariate path analytic models in a structural equation modeling framework.
    Bryan A; Schmiege SJ; Broaddus MR
    AIDS Behav; 2007 May; 11(3):365-83. PubMed ID: 16917669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model for integrating fixed-, random-, and mixed-effects meta-analyses into structural equation modeling.
    Cheung MW
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):182-202. PubMed ID: 18778151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structural equation modeling of paired-comparison and ranking data.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Böckenholt U
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Sep; 10(3):285-304. PubMed ID: 16221029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads.
    Olsen JA; Kenny DA
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):127-41. PubMed ID: 16784334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing groups on latent variables: a structural equation modeling approach.
    Dimitrov DM
    Work; 2006; 26(4):429-36. PubMed ID: 16788262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structural equation modeling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions.
    Tomarken AJ; Waller NG
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2005; 1():31-65. PubMed ID: 17716081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations.
    Jackson DL; Gillaspy JA; Purc-Stephenson R
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):6-23. PubMed ID: 19271845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AMOS versus LISREL: one data set, two analyses.
    Clayton MF; Pett MA
    Nurs Res; 2008; 57(4):283-92. PubMed ID: 18641497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The application of structural equation model approach in epidemiological research].
    Yang TZ; Ruan HJ; Li FZ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 26(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 15941543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using simultaneous equation modeling for defining complex phenotypes.
    King TM
    BMC Genet; 2003 Dec; 4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S10. PubMed ID: 14975078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The structural equation modeling technique did not show a response shift, contrary to the results of the then test and the individualized approaches.
    Ahmed S; Mayo NE; Wood-Dauphinee S; Hanley JA; Cohen SR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 58(11):1125-33. PubMed ID: 16223655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation.
    Preacher KJ; Zyphur MJ; Zhang Z
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):209-33. PubMed ID: 20822249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and validity of structural equation modeling applied to neuroimaging data: a simulation study.
    Boucard A; Marchand A; Noguès X
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Nov; 166(2):278-92. PubMed ID: 17825426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing standardized coefficients in structural equation modeling: a model reparameterization approach.
    Kwan JL; Chan W
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):730-45. PubMed ID: 21512876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of structural equation and multidimensional Rasch modeling approaches to Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
    Wolfe EW; Singh K
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(3):212-21. PubMed ID: 22357124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Introduction to the special section on structural equation modeling.
    Tomarken AJ; Baker TB
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2003 Nov; 112(4):523-5. PubMed ID: 14674866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling.
    Cole DA; Maxwell SE
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2003 Nov; 112(4):558-77. PubMed ID: 14674869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reporting structural equation modeling results in Psychology and Aging: some proposed guidelines.
    Raykov T; Tomer A; Nesselroade JR
    Psychol Aging; 1991 Dec; 6(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 1777136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.