These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18556159)

  • 21. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Audio-visual identification of place of articulation and voicing in white and babble noise.
    Alm M; Behne DM; Wang Y; Eg R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):377-87. PubMed ID: 19603894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of acoustic noise on the auditory nerve compound action potentials evoked by electric pulse trains.
    Nourski KV; Abbas PJ; Miller CA; Robinson BK; Jeng FC
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):141-53. PubMed ID: 15811706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Psychophysiological analyses demonstrate the importance of neural envelope coding for speech perception in noise.
    Swaminathan J; Heinz MG
    J Neurosci; 2012 Feb; 32(5):1747-56. PubMed ID: 22302814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults.
    Huang Y; Huang Q; Chen X; Qu T; Wu X; Li L
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):51-65. PubMed ID: 18694813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating the influence of the 'unity assumption' on the temporal perception of realistic audiovisual stimuli.
    Vatakis A; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 17258164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Psychophysical assessment of the level-dependent representation of high-frequency spectral notches in the peripheral auditory system.
    Alves-Pinto A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):409-21. PubMed ID: 18646986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Direct comparison between properties of adaptation of the auditory nerve and the ventral cochlear nucleus in response to repetitive clicks.
    Meyer K; Rouiller EM; Loquet G
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):144-55. PubMed ID: 17391881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perceptual restoration of obliterated sounds.
    Warren RM
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):371-83. PubMed ID: 6385048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
    Harkrider AW; Plyler PN; Hedrick MS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A model-based analysis of the "combined-stimulation advantage".
    Seldran F; Micheyl C; Truy E; Berger-Vachon C; Thai-Van H; Gallego S
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):252-64. PubMed ID: 21801823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predictions of psychophysical measurements for sinusoidal amplitude modulated (SAM) pulse-train stimuli from a stochastic model.
    Xu Y; Collins LM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Aug; 54(8):1389-98. PubMed ID: 17694859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual stimuli can impair auditory processing in cochlear implant users.
    Champoux F; Lepore F; Gagné JP; Théoret H
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18824184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Studying the Effect of Carrier Type on the Perception of Vocoded Stimuli via Mismatch Negativity.
    Xu D; Zheng D; Chen F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():3167-3170. PubMed ID: 31946560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hearing a voice in the noise: auditory hallucinations and speech perception.
    Vercammen A; de Haan EH; Aleman A
    Psychol Med; 2008 Aug; 38(8):1177-84. PubMed ID: 18076771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perception of envelope-enhanced speech in the presence of noise by individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Narne VK; Vanaja CS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):136-42. PubMed ID: 19125036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Nonlinear modeling of auditory-nerve rate responses to wideband stimuli.
    Young ED; Calhoun BM
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Dec; 94(6):4441-54. PubMed ID: 16162837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Natural boundaries in gap detection are related to categorical perception of stop consonants.
    Elangovan S; Stuart A
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):761-74. PubMed ID: 18769272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.