119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18556637)
1. Health utility bias: a systematic review and meta-analytic evaluation.
Doctor JN; Bleichrodt H; Lin HJ
Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 18556637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correcting biases in standard gamble and time tradeoff utilities.
van Osch SM; Wakker PP; van den Hout WB; Stiggelbout AM
Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(5):511-7. PubMed ID: 15359000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities.
Bleichrodt H
Health Econ; 2002 Jul; 11(5):447-56. PubMed ID: 12112493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rating scale, standard gamble, and time trade-off for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries.
Lin MR; Hwang HF; Chung KP; Huang C; Chen CY
Phys Ther; 2006 Mar; 86(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 16506870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey.
Flood C; Barlow S; Simpson A; Burls A; Price A; Cartwright M; Brini S;
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205223. PubMed ID: 30352071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The utility assessment method order influences measurement of parents' risk attitude.
Finnell SM; Carroll AE; Downs SM
Value Health; 2012; 15(6):926-32. PubMed ID: 22999143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Examination of assumptions in using time tradeoff and standard gamble utilities in individuals with spinal cord injury.
Lin MR; Yu WY; Wang SC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 93(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 22289233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility, comparability, and reliability of the standard gamble compared with the rating scale and time trade-off techniques in Korean population.
Kim SH; Lee SI; Jo MW
Qual Life Res; 2017 Dec; 26(12):3387-3397. PubMed ID: 28801862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
Noel CW; Lee DJ; Kong Q; Xu W; Simpson C; Brown D; Gilbert RW; Gullane PJ; Irish JC; Huang SH; O'Sullivan B; Goldstein DP; de Almeida JR
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health values of patients with systemic sclerosis.
Khanna D; Ahmed M; Furst DE; Ginsburg SS; Park GS; Hornung R; Tsevat J
Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Feb; 57(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 17266070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpretation of health and vision utilities in low vision patients.
Malkin AG; Goldstein JE; Massof RW
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 89(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 22227913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient utilities in chronic musculoskeletal pain: how useful is the standard gamble method?
Goossens ME; Vlaeyen JW; Rutten-van Mölken MP; van der Linden SM
Pain; 1999 Mar; 80(1-2):365-75. PubMed ID: 10204750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of health state utilities for dentofacial deformity as derived from patients and members of the general public.
Cunningham SJ; Hunt NP
Eur J Orthod; 2000 Jun; 22(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 10920566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preference-based quality of life of patients on renal replacement therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liem YS; Bosch JL; Hunink MG
Value Health; 2008; 11(4):733-41. PubMed ID: 18194399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility assessment in cancer patients: adjustment of time tradeoff scores for the utility of life years and comparison with standard gamble scores.
Stiggelbout AM; Kiebert GM; Kievit J; Leer JW; Stoter G; de Haes JC
Med Decis Making; 1994; 14(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 8152360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What is it going to be, TTO or SG? A direct test of the validity of health state valuation.
Lipman SA; Brouwer WBF; Attema AE
Health Econ; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 32744408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility Analysis of Vision-related Quality of Life in Patients With Glaucoma and Different Perceptions from Ophthalmologists.
Zhang S; Liang Y; Chen Y; Musch DC; Zhang C; Wang N
J Glaucoma; 2015 Sep; 24(7):508-14. PubMed ID: 25415642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The construction of standard gamble utilities.
van Osch SM; Stiggelbout AM
Health Econ; 2008 Jan; 17(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 17410521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The comparability and reliability of five health-state valuation methods.
Krabbe PF; Essink-Bot ML; Bonsel GJ
Soc Sci Med; 1997 Dec; 45(11):1641-52. PubMed ID: 9428084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do medical house officers value the health of veterans differently from the health of non-veterans?
Yi MS; Luckhaupt S; Mrus JM; Tsevat J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2004 Apr; 2():19. PubMed ID: 15070409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
